National Bridge Inventory: California Congressional District 12


  • Of the 133 bridges in the counties of this district, 18, or 13.5 percent, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one of the key elements is in poor or worse condition.
  • This is up from 7 bridges classified as structurally deficient in 2019.
  • Repairs are needed on 19 bridges in the district, which will cost an estimated $119.7 million.
  • This compares to 8 bridges that needed work in 2019.
  • The state has committed $22.8 million in IIJA bridge formula funds to support 1 project in the District.

County Year Built Daily Crossings Type of Bridge Location
San Francisco 1960 170,000 Urban Interstate I 280 N, Al Line over 280/101 Interchange
San Francisco 1964 170,000 Urban Interstate NB and SB Rte 280 over Lyell Street
San Francisco 1964 166,000 Urban Interstate I 280 over San Jose & Sickles Ave
San Francisco 1960 153,800 Urban Interstate 101 and 280 over 280/101 Interchange
San Francisco 1966 132,000 Urban Interstate Interstate 280 over Alemany Blvd
San Francisco 1960 80,000 Urban Interstate I 280 S, Au Line over 280/101 Interchange
San Francisco 1960 80,000 Urban Interstate I 280 - 101S (Wu) over 280/101 Interchange
San Francisco 1945 50,000 Urban other principal arterial Third Street over Islais Creek
San Francisco 1966 40,000 Urban freeway/expressway S280-S101 Connectr over N101-N280 Connector Ramp
San Francisco 1947 30,000 Urban other principal arterial Evans Ave over Caltrain & UP RR
San Francisco 1964 26,805 Urban other principal arterial Geneva Ave over Route I 280
San Francisco 1968 20,000 Urban minor arterial Mariposa St over Caltrain & UP RR
San Francisco 1964 11,200 Urban Interstate I280S Off-Monterey over I 280,San Jose,Muni,Bart
San Francisco 1936 10,200 Urban collector Williams Avenue over Caltrain & UP RR
San Francisco 1963 10,055 Urban other principal arterial Alemany Blvd NB over Route I 280
San Francisco 1968 7,000 Urban other principal arterial 18th Street over Route 280
San Francisco 1963 5,512 Urban collector Justin Drive over Route I 280
San Francisco 1964 3,662 Urban minor arterial Paulding/Judson St over Rte I 280, Bart-2 Tracks
Type of Bridge Number of Bridges Area of All Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on All Bridges Number of Structurally Deficient Bridges Area of Structurally Deficient Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rural arterial 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rural minor arterial 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rural major collector 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rural minor collector 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rural local road 0 0 0 0 0 0
Urban Interstate 32 837,756 2,926,200 8 31,768 963,000
Urban freeway/expressway 35 237,180 3,367,300 1 4,080 40,000
Urban other principal arterial 41 75,733 1,263,409 5 8,014 123,860
Urban minor arterial 9 9,597 126,775 2 2,247 23,662
Urban collector 8 5,747 54,872 2 1,271 15,712
Urban local road 8 7,891 21,700 0 0 0
Total 133 1,173,904 7,760,256 18 47,380 1,166,234
Type of Work Number of Bridges Cost to Repair
(in millions)
Daily Crossings Area of Bridges
(sq. meters)
Bridge replacement 3 $12.7 91,200 3,750
Widening & rehabilitation 0 $0.0 0 0
Rehabilitation 15 $104.9 1,075,034 43,630
Deck rehabilitation/replacement 0 $0.0 0 0
Other structural work 1 $2.1 1,000 577
Total 19 $119.7 1,167,234 47,957

Data includes information for the following area(s): San Francisco County

About the data:

Data and cost estimates are from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on July 3, 2023. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

Effective January 1, 2018, FHWA changed the definition of structurally deficient as part of the final rule on highway and bridge performance measures, published May 20, 2017 pursuant to the 2012 federal aid highway bill Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Two measures that were previously used to classify bridges as structurally deficient are no longer used. This includes bridges where the overall structural evaluation was rated in poor or worse condition, or where the adequacy of waterway openings was insufficient.

The new definition limits the classification to bridges where one of the key structural elements—the deck, superstructure, substructure or culverts, are rated in poor or worse condition. During inspection, the conditions of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition.

Cost estimates have been derived by ARTBA, based on 2022 average bridge replacement costs for structures on and off the National Highway System, published by FHWA. Bridge rehabilitation costs are estimated to be 68 percent of replacement costs. A bridge is considered to need repair if the structure has identified repairs as part of the NBI, a repair cost estimate is supplied by the bridge owner or the bridge is classified as structurally deficient. Please note that for a few states, the number of bridges needing to be repaired can vary significantly from year to year, and reflects the data entered by the state.

Bridges are classified by FHWA into types based on the functional classification of the roadway on the bridge. Interstates comprise routes officially designated by the Secretary of Transportation. Other principal arterials serve major centers of urban areas or provide mobility through rural areas. Freeways and expressways have directional lanes generally separated by a physical barrier, and access/egress points generally limited to on- and off-ramps. Minor arterials serve smaller areas and are used for trips of moderate length. Collectors funnel traffic from local roads to the arterial network; major collectors have higher speed limits and traffic volumes and are longer in length and spaced at greater intervals, while minor collectors are shorter and provide service to smaller communities. Local roads do not carry through traffic and are intended for short distance travel.

27
Compared to 27 in 2022

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridges

1. West Virginia 20.0%
26. Mississippi 6.0%
27. California 6.0%
28. South Carolina 6.0%

6
Compared to 8 in 2022

in the nation in # of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 4,558
5. Oklahoma 1,815
6. California 1,591
7. New York 1,578

16
Compared to 21 in 2022

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridge deck area

1. Rhode Island 15.0%
15. Connecticut 7.0%
16. California 7.0%
17. New Hampshire 7.0%
Full State Ranking

Advertisement


  • Source: Data is from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on July 3, 2023. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

    ARTBA is a non-partisan federation whose primary goal is to aggressively grow and protect transportation infrastructure investment to meet the public and business demand for safe and efficient travel.

  • Privacy & Cookies Policy
Connect With Us

Copyright © 2024 American Road & Transportation Builders Association