National Bridge Inventory: Arizona



  • The state has identified needed repairs on 1,646 bridges.
  • This compares to 1,789 bridges that needed work in 2019.
  • Over the life of the IIJA, Arizona will receive a total of $225.0 million in bridge formula funds, which will help make needed repairs.
  • Arizona currently has access to $90.0 million of that total, and has committed $41.3 million towards 4 projects as of June 2023.
  • Of the 8,544 bridges in the state, 95, or 1.1 percent, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one of the key elements is in poor or worse condition.
  • This is down from 137 bridges classified as structurally deficient in 2019.
  • The deck area of structurally deficient bridges accounts for 1.0 percent of total deck area on all structures.

County Year Built Daily Crossings Type of Bridge Location
Pima 1966 38,365 Urban minor arterial 22nd Street over SPRR; Aviation Hwy
Maricopa 1976 34,003 Urban other principal arterial Shea Boulevard over Indian Bend Wash
Mohave 1964 27,997 Rural Interstate I 15 over Virgin River
Mohave 1967 21,051 Rural Interstate I 15 over Virgin River
Mohave 1972 20,007 Rural Interstate I 15; NB over Virgin River
Mohave 1973 20,007 Rural Interstate I 15; SB over Virgin River
Navajo 1969 13,297 Rural Interstate I-40 WB over SB 40
Apache 1964 8,418 Rural Interstate IRR I 40; WB over Window Rock Rd
Yuma 1978 8,350 Urban Interstate I 8 EB over Colo R Pentntry Av Sptco
Pinal 1929 7,553 Rural arterial US 60 over Waterfall Canyon
Pinal 1949 6,929 Rural arterial US 60 over Queen Creek
Cochise 1960 6,798 Rural minor arterial SR 80 over San Pedro River
Yavapai 1977 5,844 Rural minor arterial SR 169 over Ash Creek
Maricopa 1957 5,487 Rural Interstate I-8 EB over Gillespie Canal
Gila 1920 5,162 Urban minor arterial Jesse Hayes Rd over Pinal Creek
Coconino 1936 4,618 Rural arterial SR 64 over Red Lake Wash
Coconino 1960 4,518 Rural arterial IRR US 89; Fap 037 over Wash
Greenlee 1943 3,839 Rural major collector US 191;Fau 9512 over Industrial Plant; Fas 21
Yuma 1965 3,550 Urban minor arterial IRR BIA Rte 31 over Southern Pacific RR
Pima 1962 3,213 Rural major collector Trico Rd over Santa Cruz River
La Paz 1962 3,000 Rural major collector IRR BIA Rte 1 over Main Drain
Maricopa 1989 3,000 Urban local road 117th Way over Wash
Pima 1959 2,908 Rural major collector Trico-Marana Road over Santa Cruz River
Pinal 1961 2,302 Rural minor arterial SR 77 over San Pedro River
La Paz 1934 2,156 Rural minor arterial US 60 over Centennial Wash
Type of Bridge Number of Bridges Area of All Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on All Bridges Number of Structurally Deficient Bridges Area of Structurally Deficient Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate 1,230 591,670 20,345,811 7 12,601 116,264
Rural arterial 930 585,984 8,405,456 4 2,860 23,618
Rural minor arterial 700 265,895 5,127,757 9 5,405 18,322
Rural major collector 1,088 464,719 2,790,668 11 4,979 16,977
Rural minor collector 352 114,194 480,170 16 6,877 7,703
Rural local road 835 241,264 740,712 34 5,960 7,514
Urban Interstate 317 643,041 17,872,889 1 10,977 8,350
Urban freeway/expressway 457 1,122,742 27,450,550 0 0 0
Urban other principal arterial 736 805,860 17,130,743 1 2,126 34,003
Urban minor arterial 685 732,523 11,089,302 3 10,381 47,077
Urban collector 461 323,610 2,933,309 1 61 660
Urban local road 753 267,171 2,065,122 8 2,138 9,108
Total 8,544 6,158,673 116,432,489 95 64,364 289,596
Type of Work Number of Bridges Cost to Repair
(in millions)
Daily Crossings Area of Bridges
(sq. meters)
Bridge replacement 1,200 $2,109 21,494,628 676,132
Widening & rehabilitation 184 $157 4,121,161 74,825
Rehabilitation 146 $336 2,327,841 156,297
Deck rehabilitation/replacement 20 $33 209,885 16,228
Other structural work 96 $216 3,326,382 99,272
Total 1,646 $2,852 31,479,897 1,022,754

About the data:

Data and cost estimates are from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on July 3, 2023. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

Effective January 1, 2018, FHWA changed the definition of structurally deficient as part of the final rule on highway and bridge performance measures, published May 20, 2017 pursuant to the 2012 federal aid highway bill Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Two measures that were previously used to classify bridges as structurally deficient are no longer used. This includes bridges where the overall structural evaluation was rated in poor or worse condition, or where the adequacy of waterway openings was insufficient.

The new definition limits the classification to bridges where one of the key structural elements—the deck, superstructure, substructure or culverts, are rated in poor or worse condition. During inspection, the conditions of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition.

Cost estimates have been derived by ARTBA, based on 2022 average bridge replacement costs for structures on and off the National Highway System, published by FHWA. Bridge rehabilitation costs are estimated to be 68 percent of replacement costs. A bridge is considered to need repair if the structure has identified repairs as part of the NBI, a repair cost estimate is supplied by the bridge owner or the bridge is classified as structurally deficient. Please note that for a few states, the number of bridges needing to be repaired can vary significantly from year to year, and reflects the data entered by the state.

Bridges are classified by FHWA into types based on the functional classification of the roadway on the bridge. Interstates comprise routes officially designated by the Secretary of Transportation. Other principal arterials serve major centers of urban areas or provide mobility through rural areas. Freeways and expressways have directional lanes generally separated by a physical barrier, and access/egress points generally limited to on- and off-ramps. Minor arterials serve smaller areas and are used for trips of moderate length. Collectors funnel traffic from local roads to the arterial network; major collectors have higher speed limits and traffic volumes and are longer in length and spaced at greater intervals, while minor collectors are shorter and provide service to smaller communities. Local roads do not carry through traffic and are intended for short distance travel.

52
Compared to 52 in 2022

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridges

1. West Virginia 20.0%
51. Nevada 1.0%
52. Arizona 1.0%

46
Compared to 46 in 2022

in the nation in # of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 4,558
45. Rhode Island 120
46. Arizona 95
47. Hawaii 80

50
Compared to 49 in 2022

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridge deck area

1. Rhode Island 15.0%
50. Arizona 1.0%
51. Georgia 1.0%
Full State Ranking

Advertisement


  • Source: Data is from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on July 3, 2023. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

    ARTBA is a non-partisan federation whose primary goal is to aggressively grow and protect transportation infrastructure investment to meet the public and business demand for safe and efficient travel.

  • Privacy & Cookies Policy
Connect With Us

Copyright © 2024 American Road & Transportation Builders Association