Tennessee Congressional District 8


  • Of the 4,652 bridges in the counties of this district, 204, or 4.4 percent, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one of the key elements is in poor or worse condition.
  • This is up from 193 bridges classified as structurally deficient in 2020.
  • Repairs are needed on 1,553 bridges in the district, which will cost an estimated $1.7 billion.
  • This compares to 1,596 bridges that needed work in 2020.
  • The state has committed $482.8 thousand in IIJA bridge formula funds to support 3 projects in the District.

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in Tennessee

County Year Built Daily Crossings Type of Bridge Location
Shelby 1958 59,405 Urban other principal arterial Fas 177 over Wolf River
Shelby 1968 53,975 Urban freeway/expressway Fau 4032 over Waring Rd
Shelby 1973 53,211 Urban Interstate I40-Ll-Exit-Ramp over I40-WB-Ex Rp / N 3rd St.
Shelby 1929 48,162 Urban other principal arterial Fap 14 297767K over IC RR & Nonconnah Creek
Shelby 1958 44,832 Urban minor arterial Fau 2825 over Cherry Creek
Shelby 1970 36,821 Urban other principal arterial Fau 2830 over Johns Creek
Shelby 1978 36,663 Urban freeway/expressway Fau 2810 over Winchester Rd
Shelby 1928 33,396 Urban other principal arterial Fau 57 299598G over SR 23 CSX & Cnic RR
Shelby 1979 31,787 Urban other principal arterial Fas 175 over Branch of Johns Creek
Shelby 1965 30,230 Urban other principal arterial Fau 2803 over I-240 & I-40 Ramps
Shelby 2003 29,627 Urban minor arterial Fau 4032 over Cnic E419 Iccn & 5250
Shelby 1954 25,855 Urban other principal arterial Fau 2810 663402M over Airways Blvd/Yale Yards
Shelby 1963 25,735 Urban minor arterial Fau 2878 over Branch
Shelby 1964 25,215 Urban other principal arterial Fap 14 over SR-14 / I-55
Shelby 1962 23,199 Urban minor arterial Fau 5012 over Johns Creek
Shelby 1978 22,230 Urban other principal arterial Fau 2813 over Plough Blvd. SB. Lanes
Shelby 1965 22,230 Urban other principal arterial Fau 2813 over Days Creek
Shelby 1978 22,230 Urban other principal arterial Fau 2810 over Plough Blvd. NB. Lanes
Fayette 1992 21,609 Rural arterial Fap 15 over Branch
Shelby 1970 21,303 Urban minor arterial Fau 2814 348583D over pedestrian walkway
Shelby 1968 21,303 Urban minor arterial Fau 2814 over Sam Cooper Blvd.
Shelby 1963 20,846 Urban minor arterial Fau 4189 over Johns Creek
Shelby 1968 20,398 Urban minor arterial Fau 5156 over Sam Cooper Blvd.
Shelby 1968 19,431 Urban other principal arterial Fau 4191 over Days Creek
Shelby 1970 18,304 Urban minor arterial Fau 2863 over Days Creek

Bridge Inventory: Tennessee

Type of Bridge Number of Bridges Area of All Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on All Bridges Number of Structurally Deficient Bridges Area of Structurally Deficient Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate 91 151,077 2,100,147 0 0 0
Rural arterial 322 306,984 2,745,052 5 12,414 62,024
Rural minor arterial 224 164,322 856,846 6 4,760 25,327
Rural major collector 646 235,430 914,412 19 11,683 26,604
Rural minor collector 628 150,942 416,658 30 8,249 29,709
Rural local road 1,251 196,195 247,161 76 11,619 14,188
Urban Interstate 197 459,596 16,291,747 1 628 53,211
Urban freeway/expressway 89 156,201 3,813,966 3 2,874 102,384
Urban other principal arterial 335 426,166 7,628,515 12 39,688 376,992
Urban minor arterial 322 311,823 4,356,874 22 29,055 323,052
Urban collector 202 76,174 879,538 10 4,510 33,216
Urban local road 345 111,759 519,144 20 11,016 33,368
Total 4,652 2,746,670 40,770,060 204 136,496 1,080,075

Proposed Bridge Work

Type of Work Number of Bridges Cost to Repair
(in millions)
Daily Crossings Area of Bridges
(sq. meters)
Bridge replacement 190 $204 1,061,683 92,106
Widening & rehabilitation 581 $444 4,927,572 306,866
Rehabilitation 712 $856 10,781,019 526,881
Deck rehabilitation/replacement 15 $175 221,057 103,476
Other structural work 55 $14 171,334 10,743
Total 1,553 $1,693 17,162,665 1,040,071

About the data:

Data includes information for the following area(s): Benton County, Carroll County, Crockett County, Dyer County, Fayette County, Gibson County, Haywood County, Henry County, Lake County, Lauderdale County, Madison County, Obion County, Shelby County, Tipton County, Weakley County

Data and cost estimates are from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on August 20, 2024. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

Effective January 1, 2018, FHWA changed the definition of structurally deficient as part of the final rule on highway and bridge performance measures, published May 20, 2017 pursuant to the 2012 federal aid highway bill Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Two measures that were previously used to classify bridges as structurally deficient are no longer used. This includes bridges where the overall structural evaluation was rated in poor or worse condition, or where the adequacy of waterway openings was insufficient.

The new definition limits the classification to bridges where one of the key structural elements—the deck, superstructure, substructure or culverts, are rated in poor or worse condition. During inspection, the conditions of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition.

Cost estimates have been derived by ARTBA, based on 2023 average bridge replacement costs for structures on and off the National Highway System, published by FHWA. Bridge rehabilitation costs are estimated to be 68 percent of replacement costs. A bridge is considered to need repair if the structure has identified repairs as part of the NBI, a repair cost estimate is supplied by the bridge owner or the bridge is classified as structurally deficient. Please note that for a few states, the number of bridges needing to be repaired can vary significantly from year to year, and reflects the data entered by the state.

Bridges are classified by FHWA into types based on the functional classification of the roadway on the bridge. Interstates comprise routes officially designated by the Secretary of Transportation. Other principal arterials serve major centers of urban areas or provide mobility through rural areas. Freeways and expressways have directional lanes generally separated by a physical barrier, and access/egress points generally limited to on- and off-ramps. Minor arterials serve smaller areas and are used for trips of moderate length. Collectors funnel traffic from local roads to the arterial network; major collectors have higher speed limits and traffic volumes and are longer in length and spaced at greater intervals, while minor collectors are shorter and provide service to smaller communities. Local roads do not carry through traffic and are intended for short distance travel.

41
Compared to 40 in 2023

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 19.0%
40. Minnesota 4.0%
41. Tennessee 4.0%
42. Virginia 3.0%

20
Compared to 20 in 2023

in the nation in # of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 4,544
19. Wisconsin 942
20. Tennessee 898
21. Arkansas 704

28
Compared to 28 in 2023

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridge deck area

1. Rhode Island 14.0%
27. Minnesota 5.0%
28. Tennessee 5.0%
29. Arkansas 5.0%
Full State Ranking

Advertisement


  • Source: Data is from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on August 20, 2024. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

    ARTBA is a non-partisan federation whose primary goal is to aggressively grow and protect transportation infrastructure investment to meet the public and business demand for safe and efficient travel.

  • Privacy & Cookies Policy
Connect With Us

Copyright © 2024 American Road & Transportation Builders Association