California Congressional District 10


  • Of the 1,030 bridges in the counties of this district, 111, or 10.8 percent, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one of the key elements is in poor or worse condition.
  • This is down from 119 bridges classified as structurally deficient in 2020.
  • Repairs are needed on 111 bridges in the district, which will cost an estimated $509.6 million.
  • This compares to 119 bridges that needed work in 2020.
  • The state has committed $15.9 million in IIJA bridge formula funds to support 5 projects in the District.

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in California

County Year Built Daily Crossings Type of Bridge Location
San Joaquin 1972 113,000 Urban Interstate Interstate 5 SB over Weber,Pershing,Fremont
San Joaquin 1970 113,000 Urban Interstate Interstate 5 over Monte Diablo Ave
San Joaquin 1971 80,000 Rural Interstate Interstate 5 NB over Paradise Cut Uc
Stanislaus 1976 71,797 Urban other principal arterial Briggsmore Road over UP RR & Brink Avenue
San Joaquin 1972 56,500 Urban Interstate Interstate 5 NB over Weber,Pershing,Fremont
Stanislaus 1963 52,500 Urban freeway/expressway State Route 99 SB over 7th Street & UP RR
Stanislaus 1963 52,500 Urban freeway/expressway State Route 99 NB over Tuolumne Blvd
San Joaquin 1975 48,000 Urban Interstate Interstate 5 NB over Mosher Slough
San Joaquin 1971 43,750 Urban Interstate Interstate 5 SB over Walker Slough
San Joaquin 1966 41,000 Urban other principal arterial West Lane over Calaveras River
San Joaquin 1966 41,000 Urban other principal arterial West Lane over Calaveras River
San Joaquin 1972 40,200 Urban freeway/expressway W4-N&S5 Connector over Lincoln, UP RR, BNSF Ry
San Joaquin 1995 37,500 Rural arterial SR 120 WB over Mckinley Ave
San Joaquin 1980 37,500 Rural arterial SR 120 WB over Guthmiller Road
San Joaquin 1980 37,500 Rural arterial SR 120 EB over Mckinley Ave
Stanislaus 1958 37,377 Urban other principal arterial Mitchell Road over Tuolumne River
San Joaquin 1972 37,000 Urban freeway/expressway SR 4 WB over Lincoln, UP RR, BNSF Ry
San Joaquin 1970 32,500 Rural Interstate E205-N5 Connector over Interstate 5
San Joaquin 1962 31,000 Urban other principal arterial El Dorado St over Bianchi Road
San Joaquin 1959 29,900 Urban collector Pershing Ave over Calaveras River
San Joaquin 1963 29,500 Urban freeway/expressway State Route 99 NB over Route 12 - Kettleman Ln
San Joaquin 1980 26,000 Urban freeway/expressway E120-N99, N99-W120 over State Route 99
San Joaquin 1960 23,500 Urban local road Thornton Road over Bear Creek
San Joaquin 1970 21,500 Rural Interstate E205-N5 Connector over Paradise Cut
Stanislaus 1967 20,500 Rural Interstate Interstate 5 NB over Ingram Creek Road

Bridge Inventory: California

Type of Bridge Number of Bridges Area of All Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on All Bridges Number of Structurally Deficient Bridges Area of Structurally Deficient Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate 113 106,617 3,050,950 17 16,675 366,500
Rural arterial 40 63,917 834,826 4 3,840 132,250
Rural minor arterial 34 24,653 252,313 2 1,585 19,020
Rural major collector 169 97,761 605,152 19 17,078 67,373
Rural minor collector 91 29,827 85,587 12 4,784 16,117
Rural local road 219 58,064 200,672 18 4,124 16,415
Urban Interstate 79 151,150 4,945,003 5 36,685 374,250
Urban freeway/expressway 74 156,612 2,956,680 8 12,991 264,200
Urban other principal arterial 82 123,728 1,475,013 13 19,456 304,634
Urban minor arterial 45 48,139 474,679 6 4,300 28,564
Urban collector 44 37,513 259,688 6 5,131 61,419
Urban local road 40 44,440 176,327 1 1,649 23,500
Total 1,030 942,423 15,316,890 111 128,300 1,674,242

Proposed Bridge Work

Type of Work Number of Bridges Cost to Repair
(in millions)
Daily Crossings Area of Bridges
(sq. meters)
Bridge replacement 28 $176 266,873 33,973
Widening & rehabilitation 0 $0 0 0
Rehabilitation 83 $333 1,407,369 94,327
Deck rehabilitation/replacement 0 $0 0 0
Other structural work 0 $0 0 0
Total 111 $510 1,674,242 128,300

About the data:

Data includes information for the following area(s): San Joaquin County, Stanislaus County

Data and cost estimates are from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on August 20, 2024. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

Effective January 1, 2018, FHWA changed the definition of structurally deficient as part of the final rule on highway and bridge performance measures, published May 20, 2017 pursuant to the 2012 federal aid highway bill Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Two measures that were previously used to classify bridges as structurally deficient are no longer used. This includes bridges where the overall structural evaluation was rated in poor or worse condition, or where the adequacy of waterway openings was insufficient.

The new definition limits the classification to bridges where one of the key structural elements—the deck, superstructure, substructure or culverts, are rated in poor or worse condition. During inspection, the conditions of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition.

Cost estimates have been derived by ARTBA, based on 2023 average bridge replacement costs for structures on and off the National Highway System, published by FHWA. Bridge rehabilitation costs are estimated to be 68 percent of replacement costs. A bridge is considered to need repair if the structure has identified repairs as part of the NBI, a repair cost estimate is supplied by the bridge owner or the bridge is classified as structurally deficient. Please note that for a few states, the number of bridges needing to be repaired can vary significantly from year to year, and reflects the data entered by the state.

Bridges are classified by FHWA into types based on the functional classification of the roadway on the bridge. Interstates comprise routes officially designated by the Secretary of Transportation. Other principal arterials serve major centers of urban areas or provide mobility through rural areas. Freeways and expressways have directional lanes generally separated by a physical barrier, and access/egress points generally limited to on- and off-ramps. Minor arterials serve smaller areas and are used for trips of moderate length. Collectors funnel traffic from local roads to the arterial network; major collectors have higher speed limits and traffic volumes and are longer in length and spaced at greater intervals, while minor collectors are shorter and provide service to smaller communities. Local roads do not carry through traffic and are intended for short distance travel.

28
Compared to 27 in 2023

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 19.0%
27. New Jersey 6.0%
28. California 6.0%
29. Washington 6.0%

7
Compared to 6 in 2023

in the nation in # of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 4,544
6. New York 1,664
7. California 1,527
8. Louisiana 1,458

15
Compared to 16 in 2023

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridge deck area

1. Rhode Island 14.0%
14. Pennsylvania 7.0%
15. California 7.0%
16. New Hampshire 6.0%
Full State Ranking

Advertisement


  • Source: Data is from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on August 20, 2024. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

    ARTBA is a non-partisan federation whose primary goal is to aggressively grow and protect transportation infrastructure investment to meet the public and business demand for safe and efficient travel.

  • Privacy & Cookies Policy
Connect With Us

Copyright © 2025 American Road & Transportation Builders Association