National Bridge Inventory: California Congressional District 10


  • Of the 1,023 bridges in the counties of this district, 123, or 12.0 percent, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one of the key elements is in poor or worse condition.
  • This is up from 113 bridges classified as structurally deficient in 2019.
  • Repairs are needed on 123 bridges in the district, which will cost an estimated $468.3 million.
  • This compares to 113 bridges that needed work in 2019.
  • The state has committed $6.3 million in IIJA bridge formula funds to support 2 projects in the District.

County Year Built Daily Crossings Type of Bridge Location
San Joaquin 1970 113,000 Urban Interstate Interstate 5 over Monte Diablo Ave
San Joaquin 1972 113,000 Urban Interstate Interstate 5 SB over Weber,Pershing,Fremont
Stanislaus 1965 101,000 Urban freeway/expressway State Route 99 over Second St-SB 99 On Ramp
Stanislaus 1965 101,000 Urban freeway/expressway State Route 99 over SB 99-North St Off Ramp
San Joaquin 1971 80,000 Rural Interstate Interstate 5 NB over Paradise Cut Uc
Stanislaus 1976 71,797 Urban other principal arterial Briggsmore Road over UP RR & Brink Avenue
San Joaquin 1969 71,500 Rural Interstate Interstate 5 NB over Paradise Cut
San Joaquin 1972 56,500 Urban Interstate Interstate 5 NB over Weber,Pershing,Fremont
Stanislaus 1963 52,500 Urban freeway/expressway State Route 99 SB over Tuolumne Blvd
Stanislaus 1963 52,500 Urban freeway/expressway State Route 99 NB over Tuolumne Blvd
Stanislaus 1963 52,500 Urban freeway/expressway State Route 99 SB over 7th Street & UP RR
San Joaquin 1975 48,000 Urban Interstate Interstate 5 NB over Mosher Slough
San Joaquin 1971 43,750 Urban Interstate Interstate 5 SB over Walker Slough
San Joaquin 1966 41,000 Urban other principal arterial West Lane over Calaveras River
San Joaquin 1966 41,000 Urban other principal arterial West Lane over Calaveras River
San Joaquin 1972 40,200 Urban freeway/expressway W4-N&S5 Connector over Lincoln, UP RR, BNSF Ry
San Joaquin 1980 37,500 Rural arterial SR 120 EB over UP RR & Ace
San Joaquin 1980 37,500 Rural arterial SR 120 EB over Mckinley Ave
San Joaquin 1995 37,500 Rural arterial SR 120 WB over Mckinley Ave
San Joaquin 1995 37,500 Rural arterial SR 120 WB over UP RR & Ace
Stanislaus 1958 37,377 Urban other principal arterial Mitchell Road over Tuolumne River
San Joaquin 1972 37,000 Urban freeway/expressway SR 4 WB over Lincoln, UP RR, BNSF Ry
San Joaquin 1970 32,500 Rural Interstate E205-N5 Connector over Interstate 5
San Joaquin 1962 31,000 Urban other principal arterial El Dorado St over Bianchi Road
San Joaquin 1959 29,900 Urban collector Pershing Ave over Calaveras River
Type of Bridge Number of Bridges Area of All Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on All Bridges Number of Structurally Deficient Bridges Area of Structurally Deficient Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate 113 106,639 3,050,950 18 18,937 438,000
Rural arterial 40 63,972 834,826 5 5,023 169,750
Rural minor arterial 34 24,654 252,313 2 1,585 19,020
Rural major collector 169 95,028 605,152 22 22,072 84,439
Rural minor collector 91 29,810 85,307 13 3,890 11,112
Rural local road 217 57,938 200,158 17 4,120 15,558
Urban Interstate 79 151,177 4,945,003 5 36,685 374,250
Urban freeway/expressway 74 156,601 2,980,300 13 19,380 560,500
Urban other principal arterial 78 116,582 1,448,313 13 19,286 302,034
Urban minor arterial 45 48,140 474,679 6 8,751 33,637
Urban collector 43 36,590 256,286 7 7,674 78,119
Urban local road 40 44,440 176,327 2 3,401 31,800
Total 1,023 931,571 15,309,614 123 150,804 2,118,219
Type of Work Number of Bridges Cost to Repair
(in millions)
Daily Crossings Area of Bridges
(sq. meters)
Bridge replacement 33 $165.1 291,214 39,406
Widening & rehabilitation 0 $0.0 0 0
Rehabilitation 90 $303.1 1,827,005 111,398
Deck rehabilitation/replacement 0 $0.0 0 0
Other structural work 0 $0.0 0 0
Total 123 $468.3 2,118,219 150,804

Data includes information for the following area(s): San Joaquin County, Stanislaus County

About the data:

Data and cost estimates are from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on July 3, 2023. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

Effective January 1, 2018, FHWA changed the definition of structurally deficient as part of the final rule on highway and bridge performance measures, published May 20, 2017 pursuant to the 2012 federal aid highway bill Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Two measures that were previously used to classify bridges as structurally deficient are no longer used. This includes bridges where the overall structural evaluation was rated in poor or worse condition, or where the adequacy of waterway openings was insufficient.

The new definition limits the classification to bridges where one of the key structural elements—the deck, superstructure, substructure or culverts, are rated in poor or worse condition. During inspection, the conditions of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition.

Cost estimates have been derived by ARTBA, based on 2022 average bridge replacement costs for structures on and off the National Highway System, published by FHWA. Bridge rehabilitation costs are estimated to be 68 percent of replacement costs. A bridge is considered to need repair if the structure has identified repairs as part of the NBI, a repair cost estimate is supplied by the bridge owner or the bridge is classified as structurally deficient. Please note that for a few states, the number of bridges needing to be repaired can vary significantly from year to year, and reflects the data entered by the state.

Bridges are classified by FHWA into types based on the functional classification of the roadway on the bridge. Interstates comprise routes officially designated by the Secretary of Transportation. Other principal arterials serve major centers of urban areas or provide mobility through rural areas. Freeways and expressways have directional lanes generally separated by a physical barrier, and access/egress points generally limited to on- and off-ramps. Minor arterials serve smaller areas and are used for trips of moderate length. Collectors funnel traffic from local roads to the arterial network; major collectors have higher speed limits and traffic volumes and are longer in length and spaced at greater intervals, while minor collectors are shorter and provide service to smaller communities. Local roads do not carry through traffic and are intended for short distance travel.

27
Compared to 27 in 2022

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridges

1. West Virginia 20.0%
26. Mississippi 6.0%
27. California 6.0%
28. South Carolina 6.0%

6
Compared to 8 in 2022

in the nation in # of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 4,558
5. Oklahoma 1,815
6. California 1,591
7. New York 1,578

16
Compared to 21 in 2022

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridge deck area

1. Rhode Island 15.0%
15. Connecticut 7.0%
16. California 7.0%
17. New Hampshire 7.0%
Full State Ranking

Advertisement


  • Source: Data is from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on July 3, 2023. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

    ARTBA is a non-partisan federation whose primary goal is to aggressively grow and protect transportation infrastructure investment to meet the public and business demand for safe and efficient travel.

  • Privacy & Cookies Policy
Connect With Us

Copyright © 2024 American Road & Transportation Builders Association