California Congressional District 24


  • Of the 1,320 bridges in the counties of this district, 68, or 5.2 percent, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one of the key elements is in poor or worse condition.
  • This is down from 71 bridges classified as structurally deficient in 2020.
  • Repairs are needed on 75 bridges in the district, which will cost an estimated $318.7 million.
  • This compares to 79 bridges that needed work in 2020.
  • The state has committed $50.8 million in IIJA bridge formula funds to support 9 projects in the District.

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in California

County Year Built Daily Crossings Type of Bridge Location
Ventura 1966 193,000 Urban freeway/expressway U.S. Highway 101 over Hampshire Rd
Ventura 1966 193,000 Urban freeway/expressway U.S. Highway 101 over Conejo School Rd
Ventura 1968 68,500 Urban freeway/expressway US Highway 101 NB over Vcy Ry
Ventura 1961 64,500 Urban freeway/expressway US Highway 101 SB over UP RR, Amtrak, & Lemon
Santa Barbara 1961 60,500 Urban freeway/expressway US Highway 101 NB over San Jose Creek
Santa Barbara 1946 60,500 Urban freeway/expressway US Highway 101 SB over San Jose Creek
Santa Barbara 1961 60,500 Urban freeway/expressway US Highway 101 NB over Maria Ygnacio Creek
Santa Barbara 1963 54,500 Urban freeway/expressway US Highway 101 NB over Castillo Street
Ventura 1966 37,500 Rural arterial State Route 126 over O Leary Creek
Ventura 1981 33,000 Urban other principal arterial Madera Road over UP RR, Amtrak, Metrolink
Santa Barbara 1971 32,500 Urban other principal arterial US Highway 101 SB over UP RR & Amtrak
Santa Barbara 1971 32,500 Urban other principal arterial US Highway 101 NB over UP RR & Amtrak
San Luis Obispo 1987 30,055 Rural minor arterial Niblick Road over US Highway 101
San Luis Obispo 1956 30,000 Urban freeway/expressway US Highway 101 NB over Traffic Way
San Luis Obispo 1956 30,000 Urban freeway/expressway US Highway 101 SB over Atascadero Creek
Ventura 1979 30,000 Urban other principal arterial Madera Road over Arroyo Simi
Ventura 1981 30,000 Urban other principal arterial State Route 126 over Pole Creek
San Luis Obispo 1956 30,000 Urban freeway/expressway US Highway 101 SB over Traffic Way
San Luis Obispo 1956 30,000 Urban freeway/expressway US Highway 101 NB over Atascadero Creek
San Luis Obispo 1957 28,000 Urban other principal arterial US Highway 101 SB over Nipomo Creek
Ventura 1965 25,000 Rural arterial State Route 126 over Ellsworth Barranca
Ventura 1971 22,500 Urban other principal arterial 1st Street over Arroyo Simi
San Luis Obispo 1956 21,000 Rural arterial US Highway 101 SB over Santa Margarita Creek
Ventura 1936 20,500 Urban other principal arterial State Route 33 over San Antonio Creek
Ventura 1962 18,500 Urban freeway/expressway S33-S101 Connector over US Highway 101

Bridge Inventory: California

Type of Bridge Number of Bridges Area of All Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on All Bridges Number of Structurally Deficient Bridges Area of Structurally Deficient Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate 5 2,135 3,690 0 0 0
Rural arterial 139 133,352 2,868,268 8 7,212 138,500
Rural minor arterial 128 94,426 625,884 4 14,425 51,155
Rural major collector 85 48,738 239,039 4 6,251 6,247
Rural minor collector 37 8,909 38,263 1 231 249
Rural local road 165 55,339 149,524 7 1,901 1,756
Urban Interstate 0 0 0 0 0 0
Urban freeway/expressway 260 289,213 14,119,237 17 15,555 929,201
Urban other principal arterial 151 212,620 3,086,973 16 23,755 298,967
Urban minor arterial 139 92,087 1,306,610 5 2,069 23,769
Urban collector 92 29,131 371,256 3 1,770 24,465
Urban local road 119 51,192 282,422 3 403 1,001
Total 1,320 1,017,142 23,091,166 68 73,573 1,475,310

Proposed Bridge Work

Type of Work Number of Bridges Cost to Repair
(in millions)
Daily Crossings Area of Bridges
(sq. meters)
Bridge replacement 21 $74 102,669 14,251
Widening & rehabilitation 0 $0 0 0
Rehabilitation 48 $210 1,372,841 59,758
Deck rehabilitation/replacement 0 $0 0 0
Other structural work 6 $35 5,600 10,159
Total 75 $319 1,481,110 84,167

About the data:

Data includes information for the following area(s): San Luis Obispo County, Santa Barbara County, Ventura County

Data and cost estimates are from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on August 20, 2024. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

Effective January 1, 2018, FHWA changed the definition of structurally deficient as part of the final rule on highway and bridge performance measures, published May 20, 2017 pursuant to the 2012 federal aid highway bill Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Two measures that were previously used to classify bridges as structurally deficient are no longer used. This includes bridges where the overall structural evaluation was rated in poor or worse condition, or where the adequacy of waterway openings was insufficient.

The new definition limits the classification to bridges where one of the key structural elements—the deck, superstructure, substructure or culverts, are rated in poor or worse condition. During inspection, the conditions of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition.

Cost estimates have been derived by ARTBA, based on 2023 average bridge replacement costs for structures on and off the National Highway System, published by FHWA. Bridge rehabilitation costs are estimated to be 68 percent of replacement costs. A bridge is considered to need repair if the structure has identified repairs as part of the NBI, a repair cost estimate is supplied by the bridge owner or the bridge is classified as structurally deficient. Please note that for a few states, the number of bridges needing to be repaired can vary significantly from year to year, and reflects the data entered by the state.

Bridges are classified by FHWA into types based on the functional classification of the roadway on the bridge. Interstates comprise routes officially designated by the Secretary of Transportation. Other principal arterials serve major centers of urban areas or provide mobility through rural areas. Freeways and expressways have directional lanes generally separated by a physical barrier, and access/egress points generally limited to on- and off-ramps. Minor arterials serve smaller areas and are used for trips of moderate length. Collectors funnel traffic from local roads to the arterial network; major collectors have higher speed limits and traffic volumes and are longer in length and spaced at greater intervals, while minor collectors are shorter and provide service to smaller communities. Local roads do not carry through traffic and are intended for short distance travel.

28
Compared to 27 in 2023

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 19.0%
27. New Jersey 6.0%
28. California 6.0%
29. Washington 6.0%

7
Compared to 6 in 2023

in the nation in # of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 4,544
6. New York 1,664
7. California 1,527
8. Louisiana 1,458

15
Compared to 16 in 2023

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridge deck area

1. Rhode Island 14.0%
14. Pennsylvania 7.0%
15. California 7.0%
16. New Hampshire 6.0%
Full State Ranking

Advertisement


  • Source: Data is from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on August 20, 2024. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

    ARTBA is a non-partisan federation whose primary goal is to aggressively grow and protect transportation infrastructure investment to meet the public and business demand for safe and efficient travel.

  • Privacy & Cookies Policy
Connect With Us

Copyright © 2024 American Road & Transportation Builders Association