California Congressional District 24


  • Of the 1,324 bridges in the counties of this district, 50, or 3.8 percent, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one of the key elements is in poor or worse condition.
  • This is down from 77 bridges classified as structurally deficient in 2021.
  • Repairs are needed on 57 bridges in the district, which will cost an estimated $253.0 million.
  • This compares to 85 bridges that needed work in 2021.
  • The state has committed $89.2 million in IIJA bridge formula funds to support 7 projects in the District.

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in California

County Year Built Daily Crossings Type of Bridge Location
Santa Barbara 1946 60,500 Urban freeway/expressway US Highway 101 SB over San Jose Creek
Santa Barbara 1961 60,500 Urban freeway/expressway US Highway 101 NB over Maria Ygnacio Creek
Ventura 1981 33,000 Urban other principal arterial Madera Road over UP RR, Amtrak, Metrolink
San Luis Obispo 1987 30,055 Rural minor arterial Niblick Road over US Highway 101
San Luis Obispo 1956 30,000 Urban freeway/expressway US Highway 101 NB over Atascadero Creek
Ventura 1981 30,000 Urban other principal arterial State Route 126 over Pole Creek
Ventura 1979 30,000 Urban other principal arterial Madera Road over Arroyo Simi
San Luis Obispo 1956 30,000 Urban freeway/expressway US Highway 101 NB over Traffic Way
San Luis Obispo 1956 30,000 Urban freeway/expressway US Highway 101 SB over Traffic Way
San Luis Obispo 1956 30,000 Urban freeway/expressway US Highway 101 SB over Atascadero Creek
Ventura 1965 25,000 Rural arterial State Route 126 over Ellsworth Barranca
Ventura 1971 22,500 Urban other principal arterial 1st Street over Arroyo Simi
San Luis Obispo 1956 21,000 Rural arterial US Highway 101 SB over Santa Margarita Creek
Ventura 1936 20,500 Urban other principal arterial State Route 33 over San Antonio Creek
Santa Barbara 1974 16,000 Rural arterial US Highway 101 SB over Refugio Road
Santa Barbara 1974 16,000 Rural arterial US Highway 101 NB over Refugio Road
Santa Barbara 1966 15,000 Urban collector Clark Ave over US Highway 101
Ventura 1981 13,495 Urban other principal arterial Telephone Rd over UP RR & Amtrak
Santa Barbara 1963 12,500 Urban freeway/expressway State Route 217 over San Jose Creek
Ventura 1938 11,600 Rural minor arterial SR 1 over Big Sycamore Creek
Santa Barbara 1916 11,250 Urban other principal arterial De LA Vina St over Mission Creek
Santa Barbara 1956 11,000 Rural arterial US Highway 101 SB over Nojoqui Creek
Santa Barbara 1956 11,000 Rural arterial US Highway 101 NB over Nojoqui Creek
Santa Barbara 2013 10,020 Urban other principal arterial Union Vally Pkway over US Highway 101
Ventura 1990 8,640 Urban other principal arterial Tierra Rejada Rd. over Arroyo Simi

Bridge Inventory: California

Type of Bridge Number of Bridges Area of All Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on All Bridges Number of Structurally Deficient Bridges Area of Structurally Deficient Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate 5 2,135 3,690 0 0 0
Rural arterial 140 134,338 2,876,668 7 6,992 101,000
Rural minor arterial 130 94,934 628,280 6 14,863 53,551
Rural major collector 84 48,500 238,470 3 6,011 5,678
Rural minor collector 37 8,897 38,263 1 231 249
Rural local road 164 60,392 149,184 7 1,777 1,858
Urban Interstate 0 0 0 0 0 0
Urban freeway/expressway 262 292,930 14,266,337 8 4,829 259,750
Urban other principal arterial 151 213,001 3,087,473 10 17,296 186,258
Urban minor arterial 140 92,348 1,309,310 4 1,786 22,369
Urban collector 91 28,924 366,210 1 1,374 15,000
Urban local road 120 51,444 283,922 3 403 1,001
Total 1,324 1,027,841 23,247,807 50 55,563 646,714

Proposed Bridge Work

Type of Work Number of Bridges Cost to Repair
(in millions)
Daily Crossings Area of Bridges
(sq. meters)
Bridge replacement 20 $72 102,862 14,156
Widening & rehabilitation 0 $0 0 0
Rehabilitation 31 $145 544,052 41,843
Deck rehabilitation/replacement 0 $0 0 0
Other structural work 6 $36 5,600 10,159
Total 57 $253 652,514 66,158

About the data:

Data includes information for the following area(s): San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura

Data and cost estimates are from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on June 24, 2025. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

Effective January 1, 2018, FHWA changed the definition of structurally deficient as part of the final rule on highway and bridge performance measures, published May 20, 2017 pursuant to the 2012 federal aid highway bill Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Two measures that were previously used to classify bridges as structurally deficient are no longer used. This includes bridges where the overall structural evaluation was rated in poor or worse condition, or where the adequacy of waterway openings was insufficient.

The new definition limits the classification to bridges where one of the key structural elements—the deck, superstructure, substructure or culverts, are rated in poor or worse condition. During inspection, the conditions of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition.

Cost estimates have been derived by ARTBA, based on 2023 average bridge replacement costs for structures on and off the National Highway System, published by FHWA. Bridge rehabilitation costs are estimated to be 68 percent of replacement costs. A bridge is considered to need repair if the structure has identified repairs as part of the NBI, a repair cost estimate is supplied by the bridge owner or the bridge is classified as structurally deficient. Please note that for a few states, the number of bridges needing to be repaired can vary significantly from year to year, and reflects the data entered by the state.

Bridges are classified by FHWA into types based on the functional classification of the roadway on the bridge. Interstates comprise routes officially designated by the Secretary of Transportation. Other principal arterials serve major centers of urban areas or provide mobility through rural areas. Freeways and expressways have directional lanes generally separated by a physical barrier, and access/egress points generally limited to on- and off-ramps. Minor arterials serve smaller areas and are used for trips of moderate length. Collectors funnel traffic from local roads to the arterial network; major collectors have higher speed limits and traffic volumes and are longer in length and spaced at greater intervals, while minor collectors are shorter and provide service to smaller communities. Local roads do not carry through traffic and are intended for short distance travel.

34
Compared to 28 in 2024

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 19.0%
33. Oregon 5.0%
34. California 5.0%
35. Connecticut 5.0%

11
Compared to 7 in 2024

in the nation in # of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 4,424
10. Kansas 1,301
11. California 1,284
12. Ohio 1,266

23
Compared to 15 in 2024

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridge deck area

1. West Virginia 13.0%
22. South Carolina 6.0%
23. California 6.0%
24. North Carolina 6.0%
Full State Ranking

Advertisement


  • Source: Data is from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on June 24, 2025. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

    ARTBA is a non-partisan federation whose primary goal is to aggressively grow and protect transportation infrastructure investment to meet the public and business demand for safe and efficient travel.

  • Privacy & Cookies Policy
Connect With Us

Copyright © 2025 American Road & Transportation Builders Association