- Of the 2,259 bridges in the counties of this district, 154, or 6.8 percent, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one of the key elements is in poor or worse condition.
- This is down from 158 bridges classified as structurally deficient in 2020.
- Repairs are needed on 187 bridges in the district, which will cost an estimated $307.1 million.
- This compares to 192 bridges that needed work in 2020.
- The state has committed $90.0 million in IIJA bridge formula funds to support 11 projects in the District.
Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in California
County | Year Built | Daily Crossings | Type of Bridge | Location |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fresno | 1974 | 76,000 | Urban freeway/expressway | State Route 41 over O Street |
El Dorado | 2008 | 60,000 | Rural minor arterial | Missouri Flat Road over US Highway 50 |
Fresno | 1980 | 49,500 | Urban freeway/expressway | State Route 180 EB over BNSF Ry & Amtrak |
Placer | 2000 | 44,970 | Urban other principal arterial | Roseville Parkway over Antelope Creek |
Madera | 1967 | 32,500 | Rural arterial | State Route 99 SB over Cottonwood Creek |
Fresno | 1972 | 31,600 | Urban other principal arterial | Jensen Ave over State Route 41 |
Placer | 1961 | 29,000 | Rural Interstate | Interstate 80 over UP RR, BNSF Ry, & Amtrak |
Placer | 1958 | 29,000 | Rural Interstate | Interstate 80 over Carpenter Road |
Fresno | 1962 | 27,039 | Urban other principal arterial | E Shields Ave over Dry Creek Canal |
Placer | 1964 | 27,000 | Rural Interstate | Interstate 80 WB over East Cisco Road |
Placer | 1963 | 27,000 | Rural Interstate | Interstate 80 EB over Hampshire Rocks,S Yuba R |
Tuolumne | 1991 | 25,060 | Rural minor arterial | Mono Way over Sullivan Creek |
El Dorado | 1957 | 20,300 | Rural arterial | U.S. Highway 50 over Snow Road |
Tuolumne | 2004 | 17,450 | Rural minor arterial | SR 108 over Mono Way |
Fresno | 1967 | 16,500 | Rural Interstate | Interstate 5 SB over Tumey Gulch |
Fresno | 1967 | 16,500 | Rural Interstate | Interstate 5 NB over Tumey Gulch |
Madera | 2000 | 15,000 | Rural arterial | State Route 152 EB over Ash Slough |
Placer | 1959 | 13,500 | Rural Interstate | Interstate 80 EB over Troy Road |
Placer | 1959 | 13,500 | Rural Interstate | Interstate 80 EB over Blue Canyon Road |
Placer | 1959 | 13,500 | Rural Interstate | Interstate 80 EB over Kingvale Road |
Placer | 1959 | 13,250 | Rural Interstate | Interstate 80 WB over Blue Canyon Road |
El Dorado | 1990 | 13,100 | Rural arterial | U.S. Highway 50 over South Fork American Riv |
Fresno | 1999 | 13,000 | Urban freeway/expressway | W180-S41 Connector over SR 41, SR 180 |
Nevada | 1962 | 12,400 | Rural Interstate | Interstate 80 WB over South Yuba River |
Placer | 1928 | 11,100 | Rural arterial | State Route 89 over Truckee River |
Bridge Inventory: California
Type of Bridge | Number of Bridges | Area of All Bridges (sq. meters) |
Daily Crossings on All Bridges | Number of Structurally Deficient Bridges | Area of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters) |
Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rural Interstate | 81 | 64,695 | 1,573,350 | 13 | 12,342 | 222,900 |
Rural arterial | 135 | 93,422 | 1,895,510 | 11 | 7,819 | 106,400 |
Rural minor arterial | 192 | 140,857 | 1,169,955 | 9 | 6,460 | 120,101 |
Rural major collector | 282 | 140,177 | 718,665 | 18 | 9,657 | 33,880 |
Rural minor collector | 250 | 81,749 | 275,532 | 16 | 5,882 | 13,186 |
Rural local road | 654 | 168,618 | 401,401 | 62 | 10,029 | 17,086 |
Urban Interstate | 26 | 50,015 | 1,221,100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Urban freeway/expressway | 226 | 357,393 | 7,851,881 | 3 | 7,134 | 138,500 |
Urban other principal arterial | 97 | 119,896 | 1,705,374 | 4 | 6,843 | 113,424 |
Urban minor arterial | 128 | 113,008 | 1,414,009 | 7 | 2,084 | 43,497 |
Urban collector | 101 | 63,806 | 703,902 | 4 | 1,681 | 12,096 |
Urban local road | 87 | 36,747 | 249,802 | 7 | 1,433 | 14,021 |
Total | 2,259 | 1,430,384 | 19,180,481 | 154 | 71,366 | 835,091 |
Proposed Bridge Work
Type of Work | Number of Bridges | Cost to Repair (in millions) |
Daily Crossings | Area of Bridges (sq. meters) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bridge replacement | 61 | $63 | 152,299 | 12,252 |
Widening & rehabilitation | 1 | $0 | 50 | 47 |
Rehabilitation | 97 | $211 | 683,618 | 60,344 |
Deck rehabilitation/replacement | 1 | $0 | 5 | 30 |
Other structural work | 27 | $33 | 41,286 | 9,768 |
Total | 187 | $307 | 877,258 | 82,440 |
About the data:
Data includes information for the following area(s): Alpine County, Amador County, Calaveras County, El Dorado County, Fresno County, Madera County, Mariposa County, Nevada County, Placer County, Tuolumne County
Data and cost estimates are from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on August 20, 2024. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.
Effective January 1, 2018, FHWA changed the definition of structurally deficient as part of the final rule on highway and bridge performance measures, published May 20, 2017 pursuant to the 2012 federal aid highway bill Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Two measures that were previously used to classify bridges as structurally deficient are no longer used. This includes bridges where the overall structural evaluation was rated in poor or worse condition, or where the adequacy of waterway openings was insufficient.
The new definition limits the classification to bridges where one of the key structural elements—the deck, superstructure, substructure or culverts, are rated in poor or worse condition. During inspection, the conditions of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition.
Cost estimates have been derived by ARTBA, based on 2023 average bridge replacement costs for structures on and off the National Highway System, published by FHWA. Bridge rehabilitation costs are estimated to be 68 percent of replacement costs. A bridge is considered to need repair if the structure has identified repairs as part of the NBI, a repair cost estimate is supplied by the bridge owner or the bridge is classified as structurally deficient. Please note that for a few states, the number of bridges needing to be repaired can vary significantly from year to year, and reflects the data entered by the state.
Bridges are classified by FHWA into types based on the functional classification of the roadway on the bridge. Interstates comprise routes officially designated by the Secretary of Transportation. Other principal arterials serve major centers of urban areas or provide mobility through rural areas. Freeways and expressways have directional lanes generally separated by a physical barrier, and access/egress points generally limited to on- and off-ramps. Minor arterials serve smaller areas and are used for trips of moderate length. Collectors funnel traffic from local roads to the arterial network; major collectors have higher speed limits and traffic volumes and are longer in length and spaced at greater intervals, while minor collectors are shorter and provide service to smaller communities. Local roads do not carry through traffic and are intended for short distance travel.
28
Compared to 27 in 2023
in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridges
1. Iowa | 19.0% |
---|---|
27. New Jersey | 6.0% |
28. California | 6.0% |
29. Washington | 6.0% |
7
Compared to 6 in 2023
in the nation in # of structurally deficient bridges
1. Iowa | 4,544 |
---|---|
6. New York | 1,664 |
7. California | 1,527 |
8. Louisiana | 1,458 |
15
Compared to 16 in 2023
in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridge deck area
1. Rhode Island | 14.0% |
---|---|
14. Pennsylvania | 7.0% |
15. California | 7.0% |
16. New Hampshire | 6.0% |
Advertisement