California Congressional District 4


  • Of the 1,550 bridges in the counties of this district, 88, or 5.7 percent, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one of the key elements is in poor or worse condition.
  • This is down from 99 bridges classified as structurally deficient in 2021.
  • Repairs are needed on 92 bridges in the district, which will cost an estimated $369.2 million.
  • This compares to 101 bridges that needed work in 2021.
  • The state has committed $18.1 million in IIJA bridge formula funds to support 6 projects in the District.

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in California

County Year Built Daily Crossings Type of Bridge Location
Solano 1932 202,000 Urban Interstate Interstate 80 over Suisun Creek
Solano 1928 189,000 Urban Interstate Interstate 80 over Green Valley Creek
Solano 1936 147,000 Urban Interstate Interstate 80 over Alamo Creek
Yolo 1951 90,000 Urban Interstate US Hwy 50 (I-305) over Westacre Rd
Solano 1961 87,500 Urban Interstate Interstate 80 WB over West Texas Street
Solano 1961 87,500 Urban Interstate Interstate 80 EB over West Texas Street
Solano 1965 60,750 Urban Interstate Interstate 80 WB over Gibson Canyon Creek
Napa 1977 48,000 Urban freeway/expressway State Route 29 over Nvrr, Napa River, Stanly
Sonoma 1960 45,500 Urban freeway/expressway U.S. Highway 101 over Westside Rd
Sonoma 1960 45,500 Urban freeway/expressway US Highway 101 over Dry Creek Road
Solano 1980 40,500 Urban freeway/expressway State Route 12 over Alonzo Drain
Solano 1961 33,700 Urban Interstate W80-S680&N680-W80 over Green Valley Creek
Solano 1963 33,000 Urban freeway/expressway State Route 37 over Napa River and Wilson Av
Napa 1981 32,500 Urban freeway/expressway State Route 29 SB over Suscol Creek
Solano 1992 32,000 Urban freeway/expressway State Rte 37 WB over Fairgrounds Drive
Solano 1992 32,000 Urban freeway/expressway State Rte 37 EB over Fairgrounds Drive
Solano 1961 31,000 Urban Interstate Interstate 680 NB over Nvrr,Cordelia Rd,Bridge
Solano 1961 31,000 Urban Interstate Interstate 680 SB over Nvrr,Cordelia Rd,Bridge
Solano 1979 22,721 Urban freeway/expressway N Texas Street over Airbase Parkway
Sonoma 1960 22,500 Urban freeway/expressway US Highway 101 SB over Chiquita Road
Sonoma 1970 21,900 Urban other principal arterial Washington St over Petaluma River
Solano 1944 20,100 Rural arterial State Route 12 over Sacramento River, SR 84
Sonoma 1999 19,980 Urban other principal arterial Old Redwood Hwy over Willow Brook Creek
Yolo 1960 17,439 Urban other principal arterial NB Jefferson Blvd over Deep Water Canal
Sonoma 1930 13,900 Urban collector Arnold Drive over Sonoma Creek

Bridge Inventory: California

Type of Bridge Number of Bridges Area of All Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on All Bridges Number of Structurally Deficient Bridges Area of Structurally Deficient Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate 72 288,861 1,961,300 0 0 0
Rural arterial 49 45,940 673,650 2 8,614 32,300
Rural minor arterial 140 69,503 925,694 5 2,553 31,439
Rural major collector 159 88,067 474,568 12 8,284 35,950
Rural minor collector 83 37,101 135,523 8 4,492 18,708
Rural local road 384 83,088 261,256 25 5,501 9,044
Urban Interstate 99 160,014 4,799,092 10 11,708 959,450
Urban freeway/expressway 125 216,073 4,976,286 11 45,260 361,021
Urban other principal arterial 80 94,958 1,407,754 4 6,653 65,319
Urban minor arterial 116 105,812 1,233,087 2 2,711 9,935
Urban collector 130 47,047 635,122 5 1,733 45,357
Urban local road 113 31,455 218,212 4 1,783 6,425
Total 1,550 1,267,920 17,701,544 88 99,294 1,574,948

Proposed Bridge Work

Type of Work Number of Bridges Cost to Repair
(in millions)
Daily Crossings Area of Bridges
(sq. meters)
Bridge replacement 25 $82 417,105 16,142
Widening & rehabilitation 0 $0 0 0
Rehabilitation 63 $286 1,157,843 83,152
Deck rehabilitation/replacement 0 $0 0 0
Other structural work 4 $2 126 450
Total 92 $369 1,575,074 99,743

About the data:

Data includes information for the following area(s): Lake, Napa, Solano, Sonoma, Yolo

Data and cost estimates are from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on June 24, 2025. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

Effective January 1, 2018, FHWA changed the definition of structurally deficient as part of the final rule on highway and bridge performance measures, published May 20, 2017 pursuant to the 2012 federal aid highway bill Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Two measures that were previously used to classify bridges as structurally deficient are no longer used. This includes bridges where the overall structural evaluation was rated in poor or worse condition, or where the adequacy of waterway openings was insufficient.

The new definition limits the classification to bridges where one of the key structural elements—the deck, superstructure, substructure or culverts, are rated in poor or worse condition. During inspection, the conditions of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition.

Cost estimates have been derived by ARTBA, based on 2023 average bridge replacement costs for structures on and off the National Highway System, published by FHWA. Bridge rehabilitation costs are estimated to be 68 percent of replacement costs. A bridge is considered to need repair if the structure has identified repairs as part of the NBI, a repair cost estimate is supplied by the bridge owner or the bridge is classified as structurally deficient. Please note that for a few states, the number of bridges needing to be repaired can vary significantly from year to year, and reflects the data entered by the state.

Bridges are classified by FHWA into types based on the functional classification of the roadway on the bridge. Interstates comprise routes officially designated by the Secretary of Transportation. Other principal arterials serve major centers of urban areas or provide mobility through rural areas. Freeways and expressways have directional lanes generally separated by a physical barrier, and access/egress points generally limited to on- and off-ramps. Minor arterials serve smaller areas and are used for trips of moderate length. Collectors funnel traffic from local roads to the arterial network; major collectors have higher speed limits and traffic volumes and are longer in length and spaced at greater intervals, while minor collectors are shorter and provide service to smaller communities. Local roads do not carry through traffic and are intended for short distance travel.

34
Compared to 28 in 2024

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 19.0%
33. Oregon 5.0%
34. California 5.0%
35. Connecticut 5.0%

11
Compared to 7 in 2024

in the nation in # of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 4,424
10. Kansas 1,301
11. California 1,284
12. Ohio 1,266

23
Compared to 15 in 2024

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridge deck area

1. West Virginia 13.0%
22. South Carolina 6.0%
23. California 6.0%
24. North Carolina 6.0%
Full State Ranking

Advertisement


  • Source: Data is from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on June 24, 2025. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

    ARTBA is a non-partisan federation whose primary goal is to aggressively grow and protect transportation infrastructure investment to meet the public and business demand for safe and efficient travel.

  • Privacy & Cookies Policy
Connect With Us

Copyright © 2026 American Road & Transportation Builders Association