North Carolina Congressional District 12


  • Of the 746 bridges in the counties of this district, 19, or 2.5 percent, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one of the key elements is in poor or worse condition.
  • This is up from 17 bridges classified as structurally deficient in 2020.
  • Repairs are needed on 175 bridges in the district, which will cost an estimated $333.7 million.
  • This compares to 157 bridges that needed work in 2020.
  • The state has committed $55.5 thousand in IIJA bridge formula funds to support 1 project in the District.

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in North Carolina

County Year Built Daily Crossings Type of Bridge Location
Mecklenburg 1971 115,000 Urban Interstate I277 & NC16 over US29/Nc49 (Graham St.)
Mecklenburg 1967 94,500 Urban Interstate I277 & NC16 over Brevard Street
Mecklenburg 1967 94,500 Urban Interstate I277 & NC16 over North College Street
Mecklenburg 1970 47,500 Urban Interstate I277 SBL, US74 WBL over I77, US21
Mecklenburg 1970 47,500 Urban Interstate I277 NBl, US74 EBL over I77, US21
Mecklenburg 1956 27,500 Urban other principal arterial Nc49 over Southern Railroad
Mecklenburg 1970 22,000 Urban minor arterial Sr4886 over US74
Mecklenburg 1972 21,500 Urban minor arterial Beatties Ford Road over NC16 & Scl.RR
Mecklenburg 1956 14,000 Urban other principal arterial Nc160 over Southern Railroad
Mecklenburg 1977 12,750 Urban minor arterial SR1138 WBL over Sugar Creek
Mecklenburg 1960 12,000 Urban minor arterial SR1441 over Steele Creek
Mecklenburg 1945 11,500 Urban collector West Tyvola Rd. over Southern Railroad
Mecklenburg 1955 11,000 Urban collector Sr2138 over Torrence Creek
Mecklenburg 1973 9,100 Urban local road Davidson Street over I277 & NC16
Mecklenburg 1981 8,600 Urban collector Sr2822 over Ut to Reedy Creek
Mecklenburg 1975 7,400 Urban collector Sr5469 over Coffey Creek
Mecklenburg 1964 4,400 Urban collector Sr2442 over S.Prong of Clark S Creek
Mecklenburg 1957 3,400 Urban local road Westmont Drive over Southern Railroad
Mecklenburg 1988 100 Urban local road Hanging Moss Trl over Ut to Duck Creek

Bridge Inventory: North Carolina

Type of Bridge Number of Bridges Area of All Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on All Bridges Number of Structurally Deficient Bridges Area of Structurally Deficient Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rural arterial 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rural minor arterial 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rural major collector 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rural minor collector 1 83 4,000 0 0 0
Rural local road 8 1,580 10,950 0 0 0
Urban Interstate 223 318,045 11,569,357 5 8,524 399,000
Urban freeway/expressway 21 22,834 951,600 0 0 0
Urban other principal arterial 98 110,965 2,740,105 2 1,676 41,500
Urban minor arterial 96 107,164 1,918,450 4 4,294 68,250
Urban collector 81 63,428 836,300 5 1,560 42,900
Urban local road 218 103,685 1,290,615 3 1,868 12,600
Total 746 727,784 19,321,377 19 17,922 564,250

Proposed Bridge Work

Type of Work Number of Bridges Cost to Repair
(in millions)
Daily Crossings Area of Bridges
(sq. meters)
Bridge replacement 11 $25 284,550 10,134
Widening & rehabilitation 0 $0 0 0
Rehabilitation 164 $309 5,214,588 190,907
Deck rehabilitation/replacement 0 $0 0 0
Other structural work 0 $0 0 0
Total 175 $334 5,499,138 201,041

About the data:

Data includes information for the following area(s): Mecklenburg County

Data and cost estimates are from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on August 20, 2024. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

Effective January 1, 2018, FHWA changed the definition of structurally deficient as part of the final rule on highway and bridge performance measures, published May 20, 2017 pursuant to the 2012 federal aid highway bill Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Two measures that were previously used to classify bridges as structurally deficient are no longer used. This includes bridges where the overall structural evaluation was rated in poor or worse condition, or where the adequacy of waterway openings was insufficient.

The new definition limits the classification to bridges where one of the key structural elements—the deck, superstructure, substructure or culverts, are rated in poor or worse condition. During inspection, the conditions of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition.

Cost estimates have been derived by ARTBA, based on 2023 average bridge replacement costs for structures on and off the National Highway System, published by FHWA. Bridge rehabilitation costs are estimated to be 68 percent of replacement costs. A bridge is considered to need repair if the structure has identified repairs as part of the NBI, a repair cost estimate is supplied by the bridge owner or the bridge is classified as structurally deficient. Please note that for a few states, the number of bridges needing to be repaired can vary significantly from year to year, and reflects the data entered by the state.

Bridges are classified by FHWA into types based on the functional classification of the roadway on the bridge. Interstates comprise routes officially designated by the Secretary of Transportation. Other principal arterials serve major centers of urban areas or provide mobility through rural areas. Freeways and expressways have directional lanes generally separated by a physical barrier, and access/egress points generally limited to on- and off-ramps. Minor arterials serve smaller areas and are used for trips of moderate length. Collectors funnel traffic from local roads to the arterial network; major collectors have higher speed limits and traffic volumes and are longer in length and spaced at greater intervals, while minor collectors are shorter and provide service to smaller communities. Local roads do not carry through traffic and are intended for short distance travel.

21
Compared to 19 in 2023

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 19.0%
20. Montana 7.0%
21. North Carolina 7.0%
22. Hawaii 7.0%

11
Compared to 10 in 2023

in the nation in # of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 4,544
10. Kansas 1,310
11. North Carolina 1,298
12. Michigan 1,281

23
Compared to 22 in 2023

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridge deck area

1. Rhode Island 14.0%
22. Montana 6.0%
23. North Carolina 6.0%
24. North Dakota 5.0%
Full State Ranking

Advertisement


  • Source: Data is from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on August 20, 2024. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

    ARTBA is a non-partisan federation whose primary goal is to aggressively grow and protect transportation infrastructure investment to meet the public and business demand for safe and efficient travel.

  • Privacy & Cookies Policy
Connect With Us

Copyright © 2025 American Road & Transportation Builders Association