- Of the 6,022 bridges in the counties of this district, 614, or 10.2 percent, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one of the key elements is in poor or worse condition.
- This is down from 657 bridges classified as structurally deficient in 2020.
- Repairs are needed on 5,466 bridges in the district, which will cost an estimated $3.5 billion.
- This compares to 5,573 bridges that needed work in 2020.
- The state has committed $40.1 million in IIJA bridge formula funds to support 19 projects in the District.
Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in Oklahoma
County | Year Built | Daily Crossings | Type of Bridge | Location |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rogers | 1940 | 9,759 | Urban local road | E0510 over Creek |
Sequoyah | 1975 | 9,700 | Rural minor arterial | U.S. 64 EB over Garrison Trib O Flow |
Sequoyah | 1975 | 9,550 | Urban other principal arterial | U.S. 64 WB over General O Flow |
Muskogee | 1905 | 7,560 | Urban minor arterial | Fau 6784 Callahan over Up R.R. Under |
Okfuskee | 1963 | 7,450 | Rural Interstate | I-40 over Greenleaf Creek |
Nowata | 1937 | 6,800 | Rural arterial | U.S. 169 over Creek |
Rogers | 1956 | 6,750 | Urban collector | S.H. 66 NB over Bird Creek & Rd. Under |
Sequoyah | 1933 | 5,000 | Rural arterial | U.S. 59 over Hog Creek |
Rogers | 1939 | 4,500 | Urban minor arterial | Fau 8545 (Cherokee over Creek |
Craig | 1956 | 4,350 | Rural arterial | U.S. 69 SB over Will Rogers Tp I-44 Und |
Craig | 1936 | 3,900 | Rural arterial | U.S. 69 over White Oak Creek |
Ottawa | 1944 | 3,800 | Rural major collector | S.H. 10 over Creek |
Pittsburg | 1968 | 3,800 | Rural arterial | Ind. Nation Tp over Creek |
Mayes | 1940 | 3,219 | Rural major collector | Fas 4907 over Trib of Neosho River |
McCurtain | 1953 | 3,100 | Rural arterial | S.H. 3 over Glover River |
Sequoyah | 1942 | 2,900 | Rural major collector | U.S. 64 over Wolf Creek Trib. |
Pushmataha | 1957 | 2,800 | Rural arterial | S.H. 3 over Kiamichi River |
Pittsburg | 1943 | 2,500 | Rural local road | C-Tree Road over Peaceable Creek |
Muskogee | 1948 | 2,200 | Urban collector | Fau 6741 (Gulick S over Coody Creek |
Muskogee | 1950 | 2,001 | Urban minor arterial | Fau6741-Gulick St. over Corta Creek |
Okmulgee | 1950 | 2,000 | Urban minor arterial | Fau 1949 (10 Th) over Coal Creek |
Mayes | 1928 | 1,900 | Rural major collector | U.S. 412 Alt. over Creek |
Le Flore | 1948 | 1,800 | Rural major collector | U.S. 271 over Fourche Maline Creek |
Delaware | 1940 | 1,664 | Rural local road | E0250 over Grand Lake-Hickory Creek |
McIntosh | 1937 | 1,300 | Rural major collector | S.H. 9 over Wallace Creek |
Bridge Inventory: Oklahoma
Type of Bridge | Number of Bridges | Area of All Bridges (sq. meters) |
Daily Crossings on All Bridges | Number of Structurally Deficient Bridges | Area of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters) |
Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rural Interstate | 183 | 173,687 | 2,262,060 | 1 | 461 | 7,450 |
Rural arterial | 628 | 526,189 | 4,093,799 | 7 | 7,632 | 29,750 |
Rural minor arterial | 337 | 224,582 | 1,310,724 | 2 | 3,569 | 9,790 |
Rural major collector | 2,449 | 834,933 | 2,481,963 | 226 | 34,845 | 63,452 |
Rural minor collector | 1 | 1,134 | 790 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Rural local road | 2,091 | 377,342 | 323,067 | 358 | 37,068 | 46,550 |
Urban Interstate | 22 | 22,560 | 473,400 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Urban freeway/expressway | 39 | 45,645 | 518,900 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Urban other principal arterial | 78 | 97,155 | 723,547 | 1 | 1,139 | 9,550 |
Urban minor arterial | 59 | 26,337 | 271,214 | 6 | 1,430 | 16,361 |
Urban collector | 45 | 19,803 | 93,642 | 4 | 3,191 | 9,925 |
Urban local road | 90 | 18,849 | 76,402 | 9 | 1,230 | 11,508 |
Total | 6,022 | 2,368,215 | 12,629,508 | 614 | 90,566 | 204,336 |
Proposed Bridge Work
Type of Work | Number of Bridges | Cost to Repair (in millions) |
Daily Crossings | Area of Bridges (sq. meters) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bridge replacement | 3,661 | $3,178 | 6,641,276 | 1,681,044 |
Widening & rehabilitation | 1,533 | $261 | 4,696,917 | 205,162 |
Rehabilitation | 46 | $30 | 85,459 | 23,198 |
Deck rehabilitation/replacement | 0 | $0 | 0 | 0 |
Other structural work | 226 | $36 | 48,945 | 31,807 |
Total | 5,466 | $3,505 | 11,472,597 | 1,941,212 |
About the data:
Data includes information for the following area(s): Adair County, Atoka County, Bryan County, Cherokee County, Choctaw County, Coal County, Craig County, Delaware County, Haskell County, Hughes County, Johnston County, Latimer County, Le Flore County, McCurtain County, McIntosh County, Marshall County, Mayes County, Muskogee County, Nowata County, Okfuskee County, Okmulgee County, Ottawa County, Pittsburg County, Pushmataha County, Rogers County, Sequoyah County
Data and cost estimates are from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on August 20, 2024. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.
Effective January 1, 2018, FHWA changed the definition of structurally deficient as part of the final rule on highway and bridge performance measures, published May 20, 2017 pursuant to the 2012 federal aid highway bill Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Two measures that were previously used to classify bridges as structurally deficient are no longer used. This includes bridges where the overall structural evaluation was rated in poor or worse condition, or where the adequacy of waterway openings was insufficient.
The new definition limits the classification to bridges where one of the key structural elements—the deck, superstructure, substructure or culverts, are rated in poor or worse condition. During inspection, the conditions of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition.
Cost estimates have been derived by ARTBA, based on 2023 average bridge replacement costs for structures on and off the National Highway System, published by FHWA. Bridge rehabilitation costs are estimated to be 68 percent of replacement costs. A bridge is considered to need repair if the structure has identified repairs as part of the NBI, a repair cost estimate is supplied by the bridge owner or the bridge is classified as structurally deficient. Please note that for a few states, the number of bridges needing to be repaired can vary significantly from year to year, and reflects the data entered by the state.
Bridges are classified by FHWA into types based on the functional classification of the roadway on the bridge. Interstates comprise routes officially designated by the Secretary of Transportation. Other principal arterials serve major centers of urban areas or provide mobility through rural areas. Freeways and expressways have directional lanes generally separated by a physical barrier, and access/egress points generally limited to on- and off-ramps. Minor arterials serve smaller areas and are used for trips of moderate length. Collectors funnel traffic from local roads to the arterial network; major collectors have higher speed limits and traffic volumes and are longer in length and spaced at greater intervals, while minor collectors are shorter and provide service to smaller communities. Local roads do not carry through traffic and are intended for short distance travel.
17
Compared to 16 in 2023
in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridges
1. Iowa | 19.0% |
---|---|
16. Alaska | 8.0% |
17. Oklahoma | 8.0% |
18. New Hampshire | 8.0% |
5
Compared to 5 in 2023
in the nation in # of structurally deficient bridges
1. Iowa | 4,544 |
---|---|
4. Missouri | 2,203 |
5. Oklahoma | 1,764 |
6. New York | 1,664 |
37
Compared to 36 in 2023
in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridge deck area
1. Rhode Island | 14.0% |
---|---|
36. Ohio | 4.0% |
37. Oklahoma | 3.0% |
38. Idaho | 3.0% |
Advertisement