Tennessee Congressional District 9


  • Of the 1,277 bridges in the counties of this district, 81, or 6.3 percent, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one of the key elements is in poor or worse condition.
  • This is up from 59 bridges classified as structurally deficient in 2021.
  • Repairs are needed on 460 bridges in the district, which will cost an estimated $945.4 million.
  • This compares to 462 bridges that needed work in 2021.
  • The state has committed $80.3 million in IIJA bridge formula funds to support 3 projects in the District.

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in Tennessee

CountyYear BuiltDaily CrossingsType of BridgeLocation
Shelby196662,695Urban InterstateI40-EB-Rp to I240 over I40-Rp-K / I240-Rl-Ex-Rp
Shelby196853,975Urban freeway/expresswayFau 4032 over Waring Rd
Shelby197353,211Urban InterstateI40-Ll-Exit-Ramp over I40-WB-Ex Rp / N 3rd St.
Shelby192948,162Urban other principal arterialFap 14 297767K over IC RR & Nonconnah Creek
Shelby195844,832Urban minor arterialFau 2825 over Cherry Creek
Shelby197036,821Urban other principal arterialFau 2830 over Johns Creek
Shelby197836,663Urban freeway/expresswayFau 2810 over Winchester Rd
Shelby192833,396Urban other principal arterialFau 57 299598G over SR 23 CSX & Cnic RR
Shelby197931,787Urban other principal arterialFas 175 over Branch of Johns Creek
Shelby196530,230Urban other principal arterialFau 2803 over I-240 & I-40 Ramps
Shelby200329,627Urban minor arterialFau 4032 over Cnic E419 Iccn & 5250
Shelby195425,855Urban other principal arterialFau 2810 663402M over Airways Blvd/Yale Yards
Shelby196325,735Urban minor arterialFau 2878 over Branch
Shelby196425,215Urban other principal arterialFap 14 over SR-14 / I-55
Shelby195624,234Urban minor arterialFau 1 over Lick Creek
Shelby196223,199Urban minor arterialFau 5012 over Johns Creek
Shelby197822,230Urban other principal arterialFau 2810 over Plough Blvd. NB. Lanes
Shelby197822,230Urban other principal arterialFau 2813 over Plough Blvd. SB. Lanes
Shelby196522,230Urban other principal arterialFau 2813 over Days Creek
Shelby197021,303Urban minor arterialFau 2814 348583D over pedestrian walkway
Shelby196821,303Urban minor arterialFau 2814 over Sam Cooper Blvd.
Shelby195521,144Urban minor arterialFau 2821 over Cypress Creek
Shelby196320,846Urban minor arterialFau 4189 over Johns Creek
Shelby196820,398Urban minor arterialFau 5156 over Sam Cooper Blvd.
Shelby196819,431Urban other principal arterialFau 4191 over Days Creek

Bridge Inventory: Tennessee

Type of BridgeNumber of BridgesArea of All Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on All BridgesNumber of Structurally Deficient BridgesArea of Structurally Deficient Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate1410,557287,466000
Rural arterial4130,976428,151111916,405
Rural minor arterial1825,843112,80316308,449
Rural major collector156,01946,0131167851
Rural minor collector6417,760106,46934479,472
Rural local road12723,11742,93181,2122,668
Urban Interstate162425,79215,323,96421,490115,906
Urban freeway/expressway76142,0053,644,50921,94190,638
Urban other principal arterial188307,0455,580,2311231,230333,992
Urban minor arterial247279,0443,853,3182537,474398,360
Urban collector10944,053591,638145,58354,664
Urban local road21682,451329,9661212,77322,546
Total1,2771,394,66330,347,4598193,0661,053,951

Proposed Bridge Work

Type of WorkNumber of BridgesCost to Repair
(in millions)
Daily CrossingsArea of Bridges
(sq. meters)
Bridge replacement47$162917,49267,981
Widening & rehabilitation166$2263,701,464146,690
Rehabilitation235$4077,865,107249,568
Deck rehabilitation/replacement5$146198,54282,847
Other structural work7$5111,8893,081
Total460$94512,794,494550,167

About the data:

Data includes information for the following area(s): Shelby, Tipton

Data and cost estimates are from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on June 24, 2025. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

Effective January 1, 2018, FHWA changed the definition of structurally deficient as part of the final rule on highway and bridge performance measures, published May 20, 2017 pursuant to the 2012 federal aid highway bill Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Two measures that were previously used to classify bridges as structurally deficient are no longer used. This includes bridges where the overall structural evaluation was rated in poor or worse condition, or where the adequacy of waterway openings was insufficient.

The new definition limits the classification to bridges where one of the key structural elements—the deck, superstructure, substructure or culverts, are rated in poor or worse condition. During inspection, the conditions of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition.

Cost estimates have been derived by ARTBA, based on 2023 average bridge replacement costs for structures on and off the National Highway System, published by FHWA. Bridge rehabilitation costs are estimated to be 68 percent of replacement costs. A bridge is considered to need repair if the structure has identified repairs as part of the NBI, a repair cost estimate is supplied by the bridge owner or the bridge is classified as structurally deficient. Please note that for a few states, the number of bridges needing to be repaired can vary significantly from year to year, and reflects the data entered by the state.

Bridges are classified by FHWA into types based on the functional classification of the roadway on the bridge. Interstates comprise routes officially designated by the Secretary of Transportation. Other principal arterials serve major centers of urban areas or provide mobility through rural areas. Freeways and expressways have directional lanes generally separated by a physical barrier, and access/egress points generally limited to on- and off-ramps. Minor arterials serve smaller areas and are used for trips of moderate length. Collectors funnel traffic from local roads to the arterial network; major collectors have higher speed limits and traffic volumes and are longer in length and spaced at greater intervals, while minor collectors are shorter and provide service to smaller communities. Local roads do not carry through traffic and are intended for short distance travel.