Washington Congressional District 2


  • Of the 1,131 bridges in the counties of this district, 46, or 4.1 percent, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one of the key elements is in poor or worse condition.
  • This is up from 36 bridges classified as structurally deficient in 2021.
  • Repairs are needed on 1,040 bridges in the district, which will cost an estimated $3.6 billion.
  • This compares to 984 bridges that needed work in 2021.
  • The state has committed $17.9 million in IIJA bridge formula funds to support 4 projects in the District.

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in Washington

County Year Built Daily Crossings Type of Bridge Location
Snohomish 1999 19,198 Urban collector Alderwood Mall Blv over SR 524/196th St Sw
Snohomish 1927 16,592 Urban freeway/expressway SR 529 over Steamboat Slough
Snohomish 1927 16,439 Urban freeway/expressway SR 529 over Union Sl
Snohomish 1954 16,439 Urban freeway/expressway SR 529 over Union Sl
Snohomish 1927 16,286 Urban freeway/expressway SR 529 over Snohomish River
Snohomish 1954 16,286 Urban freeway/expressway SR 529 over Snohomish River
Snohomish 1957 15,153 Urban other principal arterial SR 203 over Skykomish River
Snohomish 1954 12,132 Rural minor arterial SR 203 over drainage overflow
Skagit 1959 11,660 Urban minor arterial SR 9 over Skagit River
Whatcom 1994 10,205 Rural major collector SR 544 over Nooksack R overflow
Whatcom 1948 10,027 Rural minor arterial SR 542 overflow Channel No 2
Snohomish 1960 8,654 Urban minor arterial Locust Way over Swamp Creek
Whatcom 1959 8,500 Urban minor arterial Electric Avenue over Whatcom Creek
Whatcom 1950 7,931 Urban other principal arterial NB SR 539 over Nooksack R
Whatcom 1933 7,694 Urban minor arterial Marine Dr over Access Rd Creek Old RR
Snohomish 1933 6,701 Rural arterial US 2 over No Name Creek
Snohomish 1933 6,408 Rural arterial US 2 over S Fk Skykomish River
Whatcom 1940 6,344 Urban minor arterial Marine Dr over BNSF RR
Snohomish 1936 6,180 Rural arterial US 2 over BNRR
Snohomish 1931 6,123 Urban other principal arterial Muliklteo Blvd over Merrill & Ring Creek
Snohomish 1972 5,643 Urban minor arterial Lowell-LArimer Rd over Cattle Pass
Whatcom 1951 5,312 Rural minor arterial SR 542 over Bell Creek
Skagit 1934 5,234 Rural major collector Old Hwy 99 North over Thomas Creek
Skagit 1972 5,032 Rural minor arterial SR 20 over Baker River
Snohomish 1946 4,883 Urban other principal arterial Mukilteo Blvd over Edgewater Creek

Bridge Inventory: Washington

Type of Bridge Number of Bridges Area of All Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on All Bridges Number of Structurally Deficient Bridges Area of Structurally Deficient Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate 35 31,861 1,055,901 0 0 0
Rural arterial 36 73,430 433,764 3 2,028 19,289
Rural minor arterial 72 41,405 386,700 4 3,100 32,503
Rural major collector 198 84,138 624,295 10 1,840 25,645
Rural minor collector 76 24,693 69,464 2 844 2,069
Rural local road 275 55,649 102,509 8 1,170 1,887
Urban Interstate 100 191,717 4,668,768 0 0 0
Urban freeway/expressway 57 179,656 1,240,386 5 19,922 82,042
Urban other principal arterial 89 108,793 1,336,828 5 6,811 37,317
Urban minor arterial 98 88,375 927,989 6 4,843 48,495
Urban collector 42 25,495 209,725 3 2,356 23,935
Urban local road 53 18,476 110,064 0 0 0
Total 1,131 923,687 11,166,393 46 42,914 273,182

Proposed Bridge Work

Type of Work Number of Bridges Cost to Repair
(in millions)
Daily Crossings Area of Bridges
(sq. meters)
Bridge replacement 419 $673 1,148,218 159,579
Widening & rehabilitation 25 $19 45,162 6,951
Rehabilitation 505 $2,822 9,676,967 702,711
Deck rehabilitation/replacement 61 $51 139,447 17,555
Other structural work 30 $65 132,131 18,686
Total 1,040 $3,630 11,141,925 905,483

About the data:

Data includes information for the following area(s): Island, San Juan, Skagit, Snohomish, Whatcom

Data and cost estimates are from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on June 24, 2025. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

Effective January 1, 2018, FHWA changed the definition of structurally deficient as part of the final rule on highway and bridge performance measures, published May 20, 2017 pursuant to the 2012 federal aid highway bill Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Two measures that were previously used to classify bridges as structurally deficient are no longer used. This includes bridges where the overall structural evaluation was rated in poor or worse condition, or where the adequacy of waterway openings was insufficient.

The new definition limits the classification to bridges where one of the key structural elements—the deck, superstructure, substructure or culverts, are rated in poor or worse condition. During inspection, the conditions of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition.

Cost estimates have been derived by ARTBA, based on 2023 average bridge replacement costs for structures on and off the National Highway System, published by FHWA. Bridge rehabilitation costs are estimated to be 68 percent of replacement costs. A bridge is considered to need repair if the structure has identified repairs as part of the NBI, a repair cost estimate is supplied by the bridge owner or the bridge is classified as structurally deficient. Please note that for a few states, the number of bridges needing to be repaired can vary significantly from year to year, and reflects the data entered by the state.

Bridges are classified by FHWA into types based on the functional classification of the roadway on the bridge. Interstates comprise routes officially designated by the Secretary of Transportation. Other principal arterials serve major centers of urban areas or provide mobility through rural areas. Freeways and expressways have directional lanes generally separated by a physical barrier, and access/egress points generally limited to on- and off-ramps. Minor arterials serve smaller areas and are used for trips of moderate length. Collectors funnel traffic from local roads to the arterial network; major collectors have higher speed limits and traffic volumes and are longer in length and spaced at greater intervals, while minor collectors are shorter and provide service to smaller communities. Local roads do not carry through traffic and are intended for short distance travel.

28
Compared to 29 in 2024

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 19.0%
27. Hawaii 6.0%
28. Washington 6.0%
29. Idaho 5.0%

28
Compared to 29 in 2024

in the nation in # of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 4,424
27. Virginia 485
28. Washington 473
29. North Dakota 470

9
Compared to 13 in 2024

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridge deck area

1. West Virginia 13.0%
8. South Dakota 8.0%
9. Washington 8.0%
10. Wyoming 8.0%
Full State Ranking

Advertisement


  • Source: Data is from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on June 24, 2025. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

    ARTBA is a non-partisan federation whose primary goal is to aggressively grow and protect transportation infrastructure investment to meet the public and business demand for safe and efficient travel.

  • Privacy & Cookies Policy
Connect With Us

Copyright © 2026 American Road & Transportation Builders Association