Washington Congressional District 6


  • Of the 1,333 bridges in the counties of this district, 74, or 5.6 percent, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one of the key elements is in poor or worse condition.
  • This is up from 57 bridges classified as structurally deficient in 2020.
  • Repairs are needed on 1,053 bridges in the district, which will cost an estimated $2.6 billion.
  • This compares to 941 bridges that needed work in 2020.
  • The state has committed $12.8 million in IIJA bridge formula funds to support 3 projects in the District.

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in Washington

County Year Built Daily Crossings Type of Bridge Location
Pierce 1961 28,462 Urban other principal arterial SR 99 (54th Ave E) over I-5, Ramps
Pierce 1934 28,423 Urban other principal arterial SR 167 over BNSF RR
Pierce 1959 27,805 Urban other principal arterial Gravelly Lake Dr over BNRR (Np)
Grays Harbor 1955 25,602 Urban other principal arterial US 101 over Chehalis River
Pierce 1936 23,196 Urban other principal arterial SR 302 over Henderson Bay
Grays Harbor 1935 20,963 Rural arterial US 12 over Wynoochee River
Pierce 1973 19,549 Urban minor arterial Portland Ave over Puyallup Ave Nprr
Mason 1973 17,635 Urban freeway/expressway US 101 over Matlock Rd
Jefferson 1982 17,634 Rural arterial SR 104 Westhalf over Hood Canal
Kitsap 2009 17,634 Rural arterial SR 104 East Half over Hood Canal
Grays Harbor 1925 15,634 Urban other principal arterial US 12 over Wishkah River
Pierce 1925 15,256 Urban other principal arterial Fish War Mem X-Ing over Railroad
Pierce 1925 15,255 Urban other principal arterial Fish War Mem X-Ing over Puyallup River
Grays Harbor 1949 14,614 Urban other principal arterial US 12 / Heron St over Wishkah River
Grays Harbor 1970 12,923 Urban other principal arterial US 101 over Hoquiam River
Grays Harbor 1928 12,466 Urban other principal arterial US 101 over Hoquiam River
Pierce 1957 11,876 Urban minor arterial Steilacoom Dupont over I-5
Grays Harbor 1965 11,538 Urban freeway/expressway SR 12 over Satsop River
Pierce 1956 9,533 Urban minor arterial SR 162 over S Prairie Cr
Grays Harbor 1969 8,348 Urban freeway/expressway US 12 over SR 107, RR, Flood Plain
Grays Harbor 1949 6,220 Urban other principal arterial US 101 over Mill Creek
Pierce 1954 5,525 Urban minor arterial Fox Islnd Br Rd NW over Hale Passage
Pierce 1927 4,905 Urban minor arterial Interlaaken Dr SW over Steilacoom Lake
Pierce 1937 4,700 Urban collector East 34th Street over Pacific to A St
Clallam 1926 4,372 Rural arterial US 101 over Elwha River

Bridge Inventory: Washington

Type of Bridge Number of Bridges Area of All Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on All Bridges Number of Structurally Deficient Bridges Area of Structurally Deficient Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate 3 4,019 123,210 0 0 0
Rural arterial 138 113,475 943,641 7 29,292 71,097
Rural minor arterial 52 27,522 258,216 0 0 0
Rural major collector 211 103,299 369,752 18 9,059 26,637
Rural minor collector 83 25,557 59,097 6 694 3,682
Rural local road 371 76,627 107,575 16 2,561 4,131
Urban Interstate 55 152,943 2,782,523 0 0 0
Urban freeway/expressway 125 295,883 3,567,997 3 9,179 37,521
Urban other principal arterial 106 168,434 1,838,323 13 32,410 225,919
Urban minor arterial 95 110,681 837,081 7 15,470 56,118
Urban collector 52 45,663 211,804 2 1,649 5,600
Urban local road 42 22,369 62,434 2 308 3,001
Total 1,333 1,146,473 11,161,653 74 100,622 433,706

Proposed Bridge Work

Type of Work Number of Bridges Cost to Repair
(in millions)
Daily Crossings Area of Bridges
(sq. meters)
Bridge replacement 340 $494 1,087,247 145,955
Widening & rehabilitation 6 $17 92,983 7,660
Rehabilitation 565 $1,796 9,291,607 799,431
Deck rehabilitation/replacement 27 $104 222,487 45,449
Other structural work 115 $147 351,053 64,113
Total 1,053 $2,559 11,045,377 1,062,608

About the data:

Data includes information for the following area(s): Clallam County, Grays Harbor County, Jefferson County, Kitsap County, Mason County, Pierce County

Data and cost estimates are from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on August 20, 2024. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

Effective January 1, 2018, FHWA changed the definition of structurally deficient as part of the final rule on highway and bridge performance measures, published May 20, 2017 pursuant to the 2012 federal aid highway bill Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Two measures that were previously used to classify bridges as structurally deficient are no longer used. This includes bridges where the overall structural evaluation was rated in poor or worse condition, or where the adequacy of waterway openings was insufficient.

The new definition limits the classification to bridges where one of the key structural elements—the deck, superstructure, substructure or culverts, are rated in poor or worse condition. During inspection, the conditions of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition.

Cost estimates have been derived by ARTBA, based on 2023 average bridge replacement costs for structures on and off the National Highway System, published by FHWA. Bridge rehabilitation costs are estimated to be 68 percent of replacement costs. A bridge is considered to need repair if the structure has identified repairs as part of the NBI, a repair cost estimate is supplied by the bridge owner or the bridge is classified as structurally deficient. Please note that for a few states, the number of bridges needing to be repaired can vary significantly from year to year, and reflects the data entered by the state.

Bridges are classified by FHWA into types based on the functional classification of the roadway on the bridge. Interstates comprise routes officially designated by the Secretary of Transportation. Other principal arterials serve major centers of urban areas or provide mobility through rural areas. Freeways and expressways have directional lanes generally separated by a physical barrier, and access/egress points generally limited to on- and off-ramps. Minor arterials serve smaller areas and are used for trips of moderate length. Collectors funnel traffic from local roads to the arterial network; major collectors have higher speed limits and traffic volumes and are longer in length and spaced at greater intervals, while minor collectors are shorter and provide service to smaller communities. Local roads do not carry through traffic and are intended for short distance travel.

29
Compared to 29 in 2023

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 19.0%
28. California 6.0%
29. Washington 6.0%
30. Arkansas 5.0%

29
Compared to 27 in 2023

in the nation in # of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 4,544
28. North Dakota 467
29. Washington 462
30. Colorado 432

13
Compared to 12 in 2023

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridge deck area

1. Rhode Island 14.0%
12. Missouri 8.0%
13. Washington 7.0%
14. Pennsylvania 7.0%
Full State Ranking

Advertisement


  • Source: Data is from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on August 20, 2024. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

    ARTBA is a non-partisan federation whose primary goal is to aggressively grow and protect transportation infrastructure investment to meet the public and business demand for safe and efficient travel.

  • Privacy & Cookies Policy
Connect With Us

Copyright © 2025 American Road & Transportation Builders Association