Washington Congressional District 9


  • Of the 1,252 bridges in the counties of this district, 50, or 4.0 percent, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one of the key elements is in poor or worse condition.
  • This is up from 42 bridges classified as structurally deficient in 2021.
  • Repairs are needed on 1,206 bridges in the district, which will cost an estimated $10.1 billion.
  • This compares to 1,162 bridges that needed work in 2021.
  • There currently are now projects in the District that use IIJA formula bridge funds.

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in Washington

County Year Built Daily Crossings Type of Bridge Location
King 1966 96,847 Urban Interstate I-5 over Lucile St
King 1940 74,410 Urban Interstate I-90 over Mercer Slough
King 1970 74,410 Urban Interstate I-90 over Mercer Sl
King 1989 68,544 Urban Interstate Homer M. Hadley Memorial Bridge
King 1940 68,544 Urban Interstate Lacey V. Murrow Memorial Bridge
King 1952 40,000 Urban other principal arterial S Boeing Access Rd over Airport Way Bar Ramp
King 1930 36,000 Urban other principal arterial Eastlake Ave NE over Portage Bay Pl E
King 1915 35,000 Urban other principal arterial Eastlake Ave NE over Portage Bay
King 1976 33,803 Rural Interstate I-90 over Game Crossing
King 1972 31,879 Urban other principal arterial 15th St Northwest over Uprr
King 1975 31,252 Rural Interstate I-90 over Raging River
King 1933 28,000 Urban other principal arterial 4th Ave S over Argo RR Yard
King 1910 27,000 Urban other principal arterial 4th Ave S over Parking Garage
King 1958 25,000 Urban minor arterial W Meeker Street over Green River
King 1972 18,894 Rural Interstate I-90 EB over Humpback Creek
King 1974 18,876 Rural Interstate I-90 over S Fk Snoqualmie R
King 1972 18,753 Rural Interstate I-90 over Bandera Rd
King 1972 18,753 Rural Interstate I-90 over Bandera Rd
King 1929 18,000 Urban minor arterial W Garfield St over Marina Pl, RR, Ravine
King 1969 17,601 Rural Interstate I-90 over SR 906 W-W Ramp
King 1971 17,601 Rural Interstate I-90 WB over So Fk Snoqulmie R
King 1964 15,000 Urban collector Klickitat Dr over I-5
King 1928 13,700 Urban other principal arterial 2 Ave Exten S over Railroad
King 1946 10,445 Rural minor arterial SR 203 over Cherry Creek
King 1931 9,740 Urban minor arterial SR 202 over Snoqualmie River

Bridge Inventory: Washington

Type of Bridge Number of Bridges Area of All Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on All Bridges Number of Structurally Deficient Bridges Area of Structurally Deficient Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate 47 68,811 1,068,344 9 11,260 175,889
Rural arterial 49 26,381 473,728 1 127 5,782
Rural minor arterial 34 12,014 296,048 3 807 26,071
Rural major collector 19 9,243 66,342 0 0 0
Rural minor collector 18 7,717 24,643 1 622 1,200
Rural local road 109 28,133 33,339 9 2,401 2,994
Urban Interstate 292 968,796 13,433,823 5 129,726 382,755
Urban freeway/expressway 162 571,056 4,966,453 0 0 0
Urban other principal arterial 162 283,856 3,978,297 7 20,584 211,579
Urban minor arterial 189 234,875 2,379,092 5 16,314 64,719
Urban collector 96 85,058 612,603 8 7,720 49,209
Urban local road 75 49,763 131,757 2 1,359 400
Total 1,252 2,345,703 27,464,469 50 190,920 920,598

Proposed Bridge Work

Type of Work Number of Bridges Cost to Repair
(in millions)
Daily Crossings Area of Bridges
(sq. meters)
Bridge replacement 265 $1,873 2,420,218 340,802
Widening & rehabilitation 34 $230 467,214 59,387
Rehabilitation 822 $7,747 23,838,999 1,857,231
Deck rehabilitation/replacement 48 $137 312,689 40,749
Other structural work 37 $116 264,655 34,279
Total 1,206 $10,102 27,303,775 2,332,448

About the data:

Data includes information for the following area(s): King

Data and cost estimates are from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on June 24, 2025. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

Effective January 1, 2018, FHWA changed the definition of structurally deficient as part of the final rule on highway and bridge performance measures, published May 20, 2017 pursuant to the 2012 federal aid highway bill Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Two measures that were previously used to classify bridges as structurally deficient are no longer used. This includes bridges where the overall structural evaluation was rated in poor or worse condition, or where the adequacy of waterway openings was insufficient.

The new definition limits the classification to bridges where one of the key structural elements—the deck, superstructure, substructure or culverts, are rated in poor or worse condition. During inspection, the conditions of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition.

Cost estimates have been derived by ARTBA, based on 2023 average bridge replacement costs for structures on and off the National Highway System, published by FHWA. Bridge rehabilitation costs are estimated to be 68 percent of replacement costs. A bridge is considered to need repair if the structure has identified repairs as part of the NBI, a repair cost estimate is supplied by the bridge owner or the bridge is classified as structurally deficient. Please note that for a few states, the number of bridges needing to be repaired can vary significantly from year to year, and reflects the data entered by the state.

Bridges are classified by FHWA into types based on the functional classification of the roadway on the bridge. Interstates comprise routes officially designated by the Secretary of Transportation. Other principal arterials serve major centers of urban areas or provide mobility through rural areas. Freeways and expressways have directional lanes generally separated by a physical barrier, and access/egress points generally limited to on- and off-ramps. Minor arterials serve smaller areas and are used for trips of moderate length. Collectors funnel traffic from local roads to the arterial network; major collectors have higher speed limits and traffic volumes and are longer in length and spaced at greater intervals, while minor collectors are shorter and provide service to smaller communities. Local roads do not carry through traffic and are intended for short distance travel.

28
Compared to 29 in 2024

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 19.0%
27. Hawaii 6.0%
28. Washington 6.0%
29. Idaho 5.0%

28
Compared to 29 in 2024

in the nation in # of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 4,424
27. Virginia 485
28. Washington 473
29. North Dakota 470

9
Compared to 13 in 2024

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridge deck area

1. West Virginia 13.0%
8. South Dakota 8.0%
9. Washington 8.0%
10. Wyoming 8.0%
Full State Ranking

Advertisement


  • Source: Data is from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on June 24, 2025. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

    ARTBA is a non-partisan federation whose primary goal is to aggressively grow and protect transportation infrastructure investment to meet the public and business demand for safe and efficient travel.

  • Privacy & Cookies Policy
Connect With Us

Copyright © 2025 American Road & Transportation Builders Association