New Jersey Congressional District 3


  • Of the 597 bridges in the counties of this district, 43, or 7.2 percent, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one of the key elements is in poor or worse condition.
  • This is from 43 bridges classified as structurally deficient in 2020.
  • Repairs are needed on 188 bridges in the district, which will cost an estimated $1.3 billion.
  • This compares to 167 bridges that needed work in 2020.
  • The state has committed $7.8 million in IIJA bridge formula funds to support 4 projects in the District.

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in New Jersey

County Year Built Daily Crossings Type of Bridge Location
Burlington 1925 72,151 Urban other principal arterial US 130 over Pompeston Creek
Burlington 1971 60,070 Urban Interstate I-295 SB over Rancocas Creek
Burlington 1971 48,366 Urban Interstate I-295 SB over Burlingtn-Jacksonvlle Rd
Burlington 1971 48,366 Urban Interstate I-295 NB over Burl - Jacks Rd (Cr 670)
Burlington 1971 45,655 Urban Interstate Route I-295 NB over Rancocas Creek
Ocean 1950 34,451 Urban other principal arterial NJ 35 over Wills Hole Manasquan Riv
Ocean 1928 26,921 Urban minor arterial NJ 166 over North Channel Toms River
Burlington 1924 24,581 Urban other principal arterial US 206 SB over Crosswicks Creek
Burlington 1935 23,822 Urban other principal arterial US 130 Southbound over Assiscunk Creek
Ocean 1923 20,200 Urban other principal arterial NJ Rt 88 over Beaver Dam Creek
Burlington 1941 16,991 Urban minor arterial Cr 537 over Mason Creek
Ocean 1928 12,985 Urban minor arterial NJ Route 166 over North Channel Toms River
Burlington 1941 12,309 Urban other principal arterial US 206 Northbound over Crosswicks Creek
Burlington 1962 12,275 Urban other principal arterial US 206 SB over US 130 NB
Burlington 1972 12,076 Urban minor arterial Tuckertn Rd Cr 620 over Haynes Creek
Burlington 1912 11,669 Urban minor arterial Cr 537 over North Br Pennsauken Ck
Burlington 1931 10,680 Urban other principal arterial NJ Route 70 over Mount Misery Brook
Burlington 1906 10,066 Urban collector Moor.-Centert. Rd over Parkers Creek
Burlington 1961 10,038 Urban other principal arterial US 206 NB over US 130 SB
Burlington 1929 9,860 Rural arterial US 206 over Springers Brook
Burlington 1949 8,777 Rural minor arterial Monmouth Rd Cr 537 over Annaricken Brook
Burlington 1912 8,244 Rural minor arterial Monmouth Rd Cr 537 over Barkers Brook
Burlington 1949 7,257 Urban minor arterial C.R. 613 over Swedes Run
Burlington 1911 5,443 Urban collector Farnswrth Av CR545 over Robinsville Secondary
Burlington 1928 4,620 Rural major collector Geo Town-C Fieldrd over Blacks Creek

Bridge Inventory: New Jersey

Type of Bridge Number of Bridges Area of All Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on All Bridges Number of Structurally Deficient Bridges Area of Structurally Deficient Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate 1 48,669 41,551 0 0 0
Rural arterial 9 14,163 311,475 1 226 9,860
Rural minor arterial 9 6,834 88,765 2 312 17,021
Rural major collector 24 4,442 74,609 4 1,334 12,038
Rural minor collector 3 1,679 3,587 0 0 0
Rural local road 62 11,456 36,200 3 124 1,246
Urban Interstate 73 118,375 2,989,886 4 8,080 202,457
Urban freeway/expressway 68 62,279 3,116,293 0 0 0
Urban other principal arterial 92 169,417 2,514,340 9 4,257 220,507
Urban minor arterial 91 47,239 1,082,714 6 1,806 87,899
Urban collector 74 27,289 443,138 7 899 28,696
Urban local road 91 25,570 189,349 7 1,216 8,365
Total 597 537,412 10,891,907 43 18,254 588,089

Proposed Bridge Work

Type of Work Number of Bridges Cost to Repair
(in millions)
Daily Crossings Area of Bridges
(sq. meters)
Bridge replacement 43 $69 297,462 8,114
Widening & rehabilitation 42 $203 434,644 34,269
Rehabilitation 27 $632 566,817 105,468
Deck rehabilitation/replacement 7 $18 68,969 3,040
Other structural work 69 $407 1,074,564 68,645
Total 188 $1,329 2,442,456 219,536

About the data:

Data includes information for the following area(s): Burlington County, Ocean County

Data and cost estimates are from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on August 20, 2024. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

Effective January 1, 2018, FHWA changed the definition of structurally deficient as part of the final rule on highway and bridge performance measures, published May 20, 2017 pursuant to the 2012 federal aid highway bill Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Two measures that were previously used to classify bridges as structurally deficient are no longer used. This includes bridges where the overall structural evaluation was rated in poor or worse condition, or where the adequacy of waterway openings was insufficient.

The new definition limits the classification to bridges where one of the key structural elements—the deck, superstructure, substructure or culverts, are rated in poor or worse condition. During inspection, the conditions of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition.

Cost estimates have been derived by ARTBA, based on 2023 average bridge replacement costs for structures on and off the National Highway System, published by FHWA. Bridge rehabilitation costs are estimated to be 68 percent of replacement costs. A bridge is considered to need repair if the structure has identified repairs as part of the NBI, a repair cost estimate is supplied by the bridge owner or the bridge is classified as structurally deficient. Please note that for a few states, the number of bridges needing to be repaired can vary significantly from year to year, and reflects the data entered by the state.

Bridges are classified by FHWA into types based on the functional classification of the roadway on the bridge. Interstates comprise routes officially designated by the Secretary of Transportation. Other principal arterials serve major centers of urban areas or provide mobility through rural areas. Freeways and expressways have directional lanes generally separated by a physical barrier, and access/egress points generally limited to on- and off-ramps. Minor arterials serve smaller areas and are used for trips of moderate length. Collectors funnel traffic from local roads to the arterial network; major collectors have higher speed limits and traffic volumes and are longer in length and spaced at greater intervals, while minor collectors are shorter and provide service to smaller communities. Local roads do not carry through traffic and are intended for short distance travel.

27
Compared to 25 in 2023

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 19.0%
26. Mississippi 6.0%
27. New Jersey 6.0%
28. California 6.0%

31
Compared to 31 in 2023

in the nation in # of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 4,544
30. Colorado 432
31. New Jersey 410
32. Maine 388

19
Compared to 18 in 2023

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridge deck area

1. Rhode Island 14.0%
18. Connecticut 6.0%
19. New Jersey 6.0%
20. Louisiana 6.0%
Full State Ranking

Advertisement


  • Source: Data is from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on August 20, 2024. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

    ARTBA is a non-partisan federation whose primary goal is to aggressively grow and protect transportation infrastructure investment to meet the public and business demand for safe and efficient travel.

  • Privacy & Cookies Policy
Connect With Us

Copyright © 2024 American Road & Transportation Builders Association