California Congressional District 22


  • Of the 1,505 bridges in the counties of this district, 55, or 3.7 percent, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one of the key elements is in poor or worse condition.
  • This is down from 79 bridges classified as structurally deficient in 2020.
  • Repairs are needed on 76 bridges in the district, which will cost an estimated $101.1 million.
  • This compares to 99 bridges that needed work in 2020.
  • The state has committed $10.6 million in IIJA bridge formula funds to support 2 projects in the District.

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in California

County Year Built Daily Crossings Type of Bridge Location
Fresno 1974 76,000 Urban freeway/expressway State Route 41 over O Street
Fresno 1980 49,500 Urban freeway/expressway State Route 180 EB over BNSF Ry & Amtrak
Fresno 1972 31,600 Urban other principal arterial Jensen Ave over State Route 41
Fresno 1962 27,039 Urban other principal arterial E Shields Ave over Dry Creek Canal
Tulare 1949 21,500 Rural arterial State Route 99 NB over N Branch Tule River
Fresno 1967 16,500 Rural Interstate Interstate 5 SB over Tumey Gulch
Fresno 1967 16,500 Rural Interstate Interstate 5 NB over Tumey Gulch
Fresno 1999 13,000 Urban freeway/expressway W180-S41 Connector over SR 41, SR 180
Tulare 1952 10,250 Urban other principal arterial SR 137 WB (Tulare) over St Rte 99 (@Pm 29.57)
Fresno 1925 9,815 Urban other principal arterial N Golden State Bl over Herndon Canal
Fresno 1925 5,867 Urban minor arterial S Hughes Ave over Houghton Canal
Tulare 1949 5,500 Rural minor arterial SR 216 & Ave 344 over Friant-Kern Canal
Fresno 1955 4,000 Urban minor arterial North Abby Street over Dry Creek Canal
Fresno 1947 3,500 Urban minor arterial State Route 33 over Helm Canal
Fresno 1947 3,025 Rural minor arterial State Route 33 over Colony Main Canal
Fresno 1969 2,982 Urban collector E Annadale Ave over C & K Canal
Tulare 1962 2,850 Rural minor collector Avenue 120 over UP RR
Tulare 1967 2,450 Rural minor arterial State Route 190 over North Fork Tule River
Fresno 1925 1,696 Urban local road N Thorne Ave over Dry Creek Canal
Tulare 1922 1,650 Rural arterial State Route 198 over Kaweah River
Tulare 1963 1,500 Urban local road Rd 284 over Tule River
Fresno 1925 1,434 Urban collector E Central Ave over C & K Canal
Fresno 1975 1,400 Rural major collector S Marks Ave over Murphy Slough
Fresno 1954 1,135 Urban local road N Fruit Ave over Houghton Canal
Fresno 1952 1,100 Rural major collector E Adams Ave over Fowler Switch Canal

Bridge Inventory: California

Type of Bridge Number of Bridges Area of All Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on All Bridges Number of Structurally Deficient Bridges Area of Structurally Deficient Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate 33 14,040 544,000 2 578 33,000
Rural arterial 78 54,801 1,393,765 2 712 23,150
Rural minor arterial 86 52,842 373,832 3 1,037 10,975
Rural major collector 194 75,558 419,635 5 569 2,980
Rural minor collector 115 31,857 113,882 2 790 3,250
Rural local road 486 123,393 336,129 25 4,374 6,680
Urban Interstate 0 0 0 0 0 0
Urban freeway/expressway 202 290,852 7,145,331 3 7,134 138,500
Urban other principal arterial 72 71,603 1,210,513 4 3,125 78,704
Urban minor arterial 93 66,512 789,556 4 791 13,767
Urban collector 77 53,022 496,072 2 643 4,416
Urban local road 69 26,614 162,207 3 663 4,331
Total 1,505 861,094 12,984,922 55 20,417 319,753

Proposed Bridge Work

Type of Work Number of Bridges Cost to Repair
(in millions)
Daily Crossings Area of Bridges
(sq. meters)
Bridge replacement 21 $20 96,309 3,925
Widening & rehabilitation 1 $1 3,500 214
Rehabilitation 40 $65 225,755 18,685
Deck rehabilitation/replacement 0 $0 0 0
Other structural work 14 $15 5,037 4,344
Total 76 $101 330,601 27,169

About the data:

Data includes information for the following area(s): Fresno County, Tulare County

Data and cost estimates are from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on August 20, 2024. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

Effective January 1, 2018, FHWA changed the definition of structurally deficient as part of the final rule on highway and bridge performance measures, published May 20, 2017 pursuant to the 2012 federal aid highway bill Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Two measures that were previously used to classify bridges as structurally deficient are no longer used. This includes bridges where the overall structural evaluation was rated in poor or worse condition, or where the adequacy of waterway openings was insufficient.

The new definition limits the classification to bridges where one of the key structural elements—the deck, superstructure, substructure or culverts, are rated in poor or worse condition. During inspection, the conditions of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition.

Cost estimates have been derived by ARTBA, based on 2023 average bridge replacement costs for structures on and off the National Highway System, published by FHWA. Bridge rehabilitation costs are estimated to be 68 percent of replacement costs. A bridge is considered to need repair if the structure has identified repairs as part of the NBI, a repair cost estimate is supplied by the bridge owner or the bridge is classified as structurally deficient. Please note that for a few states, the number of bridges needing to be repaired can vary significantly from year to year, and reflects the data entered by the state.

Bridges are classified by FHWA into types based on the functional classification of the roadway on the bridge. Interstates comprise routes officially designated by the Secretary of Transportation. Other principal arterials serve major centers of urban areas or provide mobility through rural areas. Freeways and expressways have directional lanes generally separated by a physical barrier, and access/egress points generally limited to on- and off-ramps. Minor arterials serve smaller areas and are used for trips of moderate length. Collectors funnel traffic from local roads to the arterial network; major collectors have higher speed limits and traffic volumes and are longer in length and spaced at greater intervals, while minor collectors are shorter and provide service to smaller communities. Local roads do not carry through traffic and are intended for short distance travel.

28
Compared to 27 in 2023

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 19.0%
27. New Jersey 6.0%
28. California 6.0%
29. Washington 6.0%

7
Compared to 6 in 2023

in the nation in # of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 4,544
6. New York 1,664
7. California 1,527
8. Louisiana 1,458

15
Compared to 16 in 2023

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridge deck area

1. Rhode Island 14.0%
14. Pennsylvania 7.0%
15. California 7.0%
16. New Hampshire 6.0%
Full State Ranking

Advertisement


  • Source: Data is from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on August 20, 2024. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

    ARTBA is a non-partisan federation whose primary goal is to aggressively grow and protect transportation infrastructure investment to meet the public and business demand for safe and efficient travel.

  • Privacy & Cookies Policy
Connect With Us

Copyright © 2025 American Road & Transportation Builders Association