California Congressional District 3


  • Of the 1,931 bridges in the counties of this district, 87, or 4.5 percent, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one of the key elements is in poor or worse condition.
  • This is up from 86 bridges classified as structurally deficient in 2021.
  • Repairs are needed on 114 bridges in the district, which will cost an estimated $282.2 million.
  • This compares to 111 bridges that needed work in 2021.
  • The state has committed $94.4 million in IIJA bridge formula funds to support 6 projects in the District.

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in California

County Year Built Daily Crossings Type of Bridge Location
Sacramento 1975 46,500 Urban Interstate Interstate 5 SB over Beach Lake
Sacramento 1990 39,505 Urban other principal arterial Antelope Road over Rail Road Tracks
Sacramento 1959 35,000 Urban other principal arterial Fruitridge Road over State Route 99
Placer 1958 29,000 Rural Interstate Interstate 80 over Carpenter Road
Placer 1961 29,000 Rural Interstate Interstate 80 over UP RR, BNSF Ry, & Amtrak
Placer 1963 27,000 Rural Interstate Interstate 80 EB over Hampshire Rocks,S Yuba R
Sacramento 1915 26,500 Urban freeway/expressway St Rte 160 WB, Lrt over American River
El Dorado 1957 20,300 Rural arterial U.S. Highway 50 over Snow Road
Sacramento 1970 19,991 Urban minor arterial Northgate Blvd over Natomas E Main Drn Canal
Sacramento 1999 17,544 Urban minor arterial Winding Way over Arcade Creek
Sacramento 2003 13,540 Urban minor arterial Bradshaw Road over Morrison Creek
Placer 1959 13,500 Rural Interstate Interstate 80 EB over Blue Canyon Road
Placer 1959 13,500 Rural Interstate Interstate 80 EB over Kingvale Road
Placer 1959 13,500 Rural Interstate Interstate 80 EB over Troy Road
Placer 1959 13,250 Rural Interstate Interstate 80 WB over Blue Canyon Road
El Dorado 1990 13,100 Rural arterial U.S. Highway 50 over South Fork American Riv
El Dorado 1990 13,100 Rural arterial U.S. Highway 50 over South Fork American Riv
Nevada 1962 12,400 Rural Interstate Interstate 80 WB over South Yuba River
Yuba 1957 11,630 Urban minor arterial Simpson Ln over Yuba River
Placer 1928 11,100 Rural arterial State Route 89 over Truckee River
Plumas 1954 10,046 Rural minor collector Gulling Street over Middle Fork Feather Riv
Nevada 1967 8,630 Urban minor arterial Broad St over Deer Creek
Sacramento 1959 8,500 Urban freeway/expressway Stockton Bl-S99 On over State Route 99
Nevada 1967 8,500 Urban minor arterial Sacramento St over State Route 20
Placer 1973 7,318 Rural major collector Auburn-Forsthillrd over N Fk American River

Bridge Inventory: California

Type of Bridge Number of Bridges Area of All Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on All Bridges Number of Structurally Deficient Bridges Area of Structurally Deficient Bridges
(sq. meters)
Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate 68 67,853 1,663,250 10 10,312 162,900
Rural arterial 115 102,110 1,587,576 4 6,258 57,600
Rural minor arterial 148 108,772 760,976 3 2,324 8,652
Rural major collector 196 106,860 574,426 12 20,924 31,211
Rural minor collector 149 48,649 259,999 12 5,045 22,048
Rural local road 428 85,585 254,397 32 5,102 14,025
Urban Interstate 100 346,275 6,712,360 1 3,183 46,500
Urban freeway/expressway 142 415,784 8,932,944 2 4,039 35,000
Urban other principal arterial 144 217,942 3,872,496 2 5,227 74,505
Urban minor arterial 162 188,986 2,491,070 6 5,590 79,835
Urban collector 126 82,960 834,751 2 1,254 6,800
Urban local road 153 64,223 592,854 1 143 400
Total 1,931 1,835,998 28,537,099 87 69,402 539,476

Proposed Bridge Work

Type of Work Number of Bridges Cost to Repair
(in millions)
Daily Crossings Area of Bridges
(sq. meters)
Bridge replacement 38 $82 134,705 15,960
Widening & rehabilitation 1 $0 50 80
Rehabilitation 54 $187 405,116 53,834
Deck rehabilitation/replacement 6 $3 255 715
Other structural work 15 $10 6,700 2,937
Total 114 $282 546,826 73,526

About the data:

Data includes information for the following area(s): Alpine, El Dorado, Inyo, Mono, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, Sierra, Yuba

Data and cost estimates are from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on June 24, 2025. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

Effective January 1, 2018, FHWA changed the definition of structurally deficient as part of the final rule on highway and bridge performance measures, published May 20, 2017 pursuant to the 2012 federal aid highway bill Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Two measures that were previously used to classify bridges as structurally deficient are no longer used. This includes bridges where the overall structural evaluation was rated in poor or worse condition, or where the adequacy of waterway openings was insufficient.

The new definition limits the classification to bridges where one of the key structural elements—the deck, superstructure, substructure or culverts, are rated in poor or worse condition. During inspection, the conditions of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition.

Cost estimates have been derived by ARTBA, based on 2023 average bridge replacement costs for structures on and off the National Highway System, published by FHWA. Bridge rehabilitation costs are estimated to be 68 percent of replacement costs. A bridge is considered to need repair if the structure has identified repairs as part of the NBI, a repair cost estimate is supplied by the bridge owner or the bridge is classified as structurally deficient. Please note that for a few states, the number of bridges needing to be repaired can vary significantly from year to year, and reflects the data entered by the state.

Bridges are classified by FHWA into types based on the functional classification of the roadway on the bridge. Interstates comprise routes officially designated by the Secretary of Transportation. Other principal arterials serve major centers of urban areas or provide mobility through rural areas. Freeways and expressways have directional lanes generally separated by a physical barrier, and access/egress points generally limited to on- and off-ramps. Minor arterials serve smaller areas and are used for trips of moderate length. Collectors funnel traffic from local roads to the arterial network; major collectors have higher speed limits and traffic volumes and are longer in length and spaced at greater intervals, while minor collectors are shorter and provide service to smaller communities. Local roads do not carry through traffic and are intended for short distance travel.

34
Compared to 28 in 2024

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 19.0%
33. Oregon 5.0%
34. California 5.0%
35. Connecticut 5.0%

11
Compared to 7 in 2024

in the nation in # of structurally deficient bridges

1. Iowa 4,424
10. Kansas 1,301
11. California 1,284
12. Ohio 1,266

23
Compared to 15 in 2024

in the nation in % of structurally deficient bridge deck area

1. West Virginia 13.0%
22. South Carolina 6.0%
23. California 6.0%
24. North Carolina 6.0%
Full State Ranking

Advertisement


  • Source: Data is from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory (NBI), downloaded on June 24, 2025. Note that specific conditions on bridges may have changed as a result of recent work or updated inspections.

    ARTBA is a non-partisan federation whose primary goal is to aggressively grow and protect transportation infrastructure investment to meet the public and business demand for safe and efficient travel.

  • Privacy & Cookies Policy
Connect With Us

Copyright © 2026 American Road & Transportation Builders Association